IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/wpaper/hal-00581766.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

When Electronic Recommendation Agents Backfire: Negative Effects on Choice Satisfaction, Attitudes, and Purchase Intentions

Author

Listed:
  • Joseph Lajos

    (GREGH - Groupement de Recherche et d'Etudes en Gestion à HEC - HEC Paris - Ecole des Hautes Etudes Commerciales - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)

  • Amitava Chattopadhyay

    (INSEAD - Institut Européen d'administration des Affaires)

  • Kishore Sengupta

    (INSEAD - Institut Européen d'administration des Affaires)

Abstract

Internet retailers offer consumers the opportunity to choose from a previously unparalleled selection of products. To help consumers navigate this sea of information, many websites provide electronic recommendation agents that ask users questions about their preferences for product attributes and then rate and rank order the available products on the basis of their responses. In an era in which consumers often feel overwhelmed by choice, previous research has hailed electronic recommendation agents as coming to the rescue by offering a quick and efficient means for consumers to narrow their consideration sets. However, in this article we report the results of an experiment in which use of an electronic recommendation agent negatively impacted participants' long-term choice satisfaction, attitudes, and purchase intentions, in addition to other managerially relevant variables. The data support our hypothesis that use of an electronic recommendation agent leads consumers to overweight utilitarian product attributes and underweight hedonic product attributes in choice.

Suggested Citation

  • Joseph Lajos & Amitava Chattopadhyay & Kishore Sengupta, 2008. "When Electronic Recommendation Agents Backfire: Negative Effects on Choice Satisfaction, Attitudes, and Purchase Intentions," Working Papers hal-00581766, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:wpaper:hal-00581766
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:wpaper:hal-00581766. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.