IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/spmain/hal-00972937.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

New challenging issues for world trade and the world economy Strategies for the EC-Turkey Custom Union

Author

Listed:
  • Patrick Messerlin

    (GEM - Groupe d'économie mondiale - Sciences Po - Sciences Po)

Abstract

The recent crisis has deeply changed the environment in which the EC-Turkey Custom Union (ECT) will develop. The world trade in goods was experiencing its worst collapse in almost a century (a fall of 20 percent in volume in one year, twice more than in 1929-30 for the same time lapse) but it looks also faster back on track. Meanwhile, trade in some services (telecoms, insurance, etc.) has been resilient to the crisis, even during its peak, while trade in the other services (transportation, tourism, etc.) has been hurt, though less than trade in goods (...).

Suggested Citation

  • Patrick Messerlin, 2010. "New challenging issues for world trade and the world economy Strategies for the EC-Turkey Custom Union," SciencePo Working papers Main hal-00972937, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:spmain:hal-00972937
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal-sciencespo.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00972937
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hal-sciencespo.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00972937/document
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Patrick A. Messerlin, 2001. "Measuring the Costs of Protection in Europe: European Commercial Policy in the 2000s," Peterson Institute Press: All Books, Peterson Institute for International Economics, number 102, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Francois, Joseph & Nelson, Douglas & Pelkmans-Balaoing, Annette, 2008. "Endogenous Protection in General Equilibrium: Estimating Political Weights in the EU," CEPR Discussion Papers 6979, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    2. repec:spo:wpecon:info:hdl:2441/5l6uh8ogmqildh09h2q8j620g is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Balistreri, Edward J. & Mavroidis, Petros C. & Prusa, Thomas J., 2021. "What If? Tinkering with the Counterfactual: A Comment on US–Washing Machines (Article 22.6-US)," World Trade Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 20(4), pages 421-435, October.
    4. repec:hal:spmain:info:hdl:2441/8330 is not listed on IDEAS
    5. Fritz Breuss, 2004. "WTO Dispute Settlement: An Economic Analysis of Four EU–US Mini Trade Wars—A Survey," Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade, Springer, vol. 4(4), pages 275-315, December.
    6. James E. Anderson & Eric van Wincoop, 2004. "Trade Costs," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 42(3), pages 691-751, September.
    7. Patrick Messerlin, 2004. "Problems of transposition and Members States "screening" process and timetable," SciencePo Working papers Main hal-00973081, HAL.
    8. Ghoneim, Ahmed Farouk, 2004. "Competition, cultural variety and global governance: The case of the Egyptian audiovisual system," HWWA Reports 246, Hamburg Institute of International Economics (HWWA).
    9. Henk Kox & Arjan Lejour, 2005. "Regulatory heterogeneity as obstacle for international services trade," CPB Discussion Paper 49, CPB Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis.
    10. Lionel Fontagné & Thierry Mayer & Soledad Zignago, 2005. "Trade in the Triad: how easy is the access to large markets?," Canadian Journal of Economics, Canadian Economics Association, vol. 38(4), pages 1401-1430, November.
    11. Jensen, Hans G. & Frandsen, Søren E., 2003. "Implications of EU Accession of Ten New Members: The Copenhagen Agreement," Conference papers 331098, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    12. Alexandra Ferreira-Lopes & Ccndida Sousa & Helena Carvalho & Nuno Crespo, 2017. "Trade Protectionism and Intra-industry Trade: A USA - EU Comparison," Research in World Economy, Research in World Economy, Sciedu Press, vol. 8(2), pages 88-102, December.
    13. Bouet, Antoine, 2008. "The expected benefits of trade liberalization for world income and development: Opening the “black box” of global trade modeling," Food policy reviews 8, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    14. Patrick Messerlin, 2010. "The European Community commercial policy," SciencePo Working papers Main hal-00972936, HAL.
    15. Kyoji Fukao & Goushi Kataoka & Arata Kuno, 2003. "How to Measure Non-tariff Barriers? A Critical Examination of the Price-Differential Approach," Hi-Stat Discussion Paper Series d03-08, Institute of Economic Research, Hitotsubashi University.
    16. Ghoneim, Ahmed Farouk, 2004. "Competition, Cultural Variety and Global Governance: The Case of the Egyptian Audiovisual System," Report Series 26109, Hamburg Institute of International Economics.
    17. Castilho, Marta Reis, 2004. "Integração regional e conteúdo de trabalho do comércio exterior brasileiro," Oficina de la CEPAL en Brasilia (Estudios e Investigaciones) 37924, Naciones Unidas Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL).
    18. Frandsen, Soren E. & Jensen, Hans G., 2001. "GTAP at Work in Denmark - Quantifying and Qualifying a Political Debate," Conference papers 330899, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    19. Jean‐Christophe Maur, 2005. "Exporting Europe's Trade Policy," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(11), pages 1565-1590, November.
    20. Lee, Hiro & van der Mensbrugghe, Dominique, 2006. "Deep integration and its impacts on non-members: EU enlargement and East Asia," MPRA Paper 82286, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    21. repec:spo:wpmain:info:hdl:2441/5l6uh8ogmqildh09h2q90i5i1 is not listed on IDEAS
    22. repec:hal:wpspec:info:hdl:2441/5l6uh8ogmqildh09h2q8j620g is not listed on IDEAS
    23. Bernard Hoekman & Patrick Messerlin, 2002. "Initial conditions and incentives for Arab economic integration : can the European Community's success be emulated?," Working Papers hal-03607662, HAL.
    24. Steve McCorriston, 2002. "Why should imperfect competition matter to agricultural economists?," European Review of Agricultural Economics, Oxford University Press and the European Agricultural and Applied Economics Publications Foundation, vol. 29(3), pages 349-371, July.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:spmain:hal-00972937. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Contact - Sciences Po Departement of Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.