Author
Listed:
- Véréna Hess
(MAGELLAN - Laboratoire de Recherche Magellan - UJML - Université Jean Moulin - Lyon 3 - Université de Lyon - Institut d'Administration des Entreprises (IAE) - Lyon)
- Jean-Fabrice Lebraty
(MAGELLAN - Laboratoire de Recherche Magellan - UJML - Université Jean Moulin - Lyon 3 - Université de Lyon - Institut d'Administration des Entreprises (IAE) - Lyon)
Abstract
Purpose Companies in the financial services sector are faced with a turbulent, destabilizing environment and challenged to maintain existing activities while seizing new opportunities to remain competitive. In this vein, technological innovation project teams play a key role, and therefore understanding how these teams work and how their members interact throughout the life cycle of a technological innovation project is important. Design/methodology/approach This research, carried out in a large financial institution, analyzes five technological innovation projects and their teams over an entire year to better understand the evolution from the exploration phase to the exploitation phase during the life cycle of such projects. To do so, the authors conducted a qualitative case study, in which they took both observer and participant roles. They analyzed the data using NVivo software and created a data structure in accordance with the Gioia method. Findings The findings show an overlap phase between exploration and exploitation, with work on the product preceding work on the business model. This finding implies an adaptation of models presuming a sequential transition from exploration to exploitation and leads to managerial implications on how to manage the simultaneity of both logics during the identified overlap. Research limitations/implications Research focuses on one traditional company, limiting generalizability to newer, smaller firms. Practical implications Research shows that companies with contextual ambidexterity manage innovation better than those with structural ambidexterity by allowing flexible integration of exploration and exploitation tasks, promoting smoother transitions in innovation phases. Social implications Research enhancing understanding of innovation processes is crucial for better management and could improve company culture and work–life balance for project teams. Originality/value This research follows teams during the life cycle of five technological innovation projects and reveals a key moment that has been relatively understudied: the transition between the exploration phase and the exploitation phase. Highlights • This article examines teams involved in technological innovation projects. • The main theoretical frameworks are organizational ambidexterity and team processes. • The research involves a study of five projects in a large European financial institution. • The findings reveal an overlapping phase between exploration and exploitation.
Suggested Citation
Véréna Hess & Jean-Fabrice Lebraty, 2025.
"Not a gap but an overlap: project teams and exploration vs exploitation in technological innovation,"
Post-Print
halshs-05009502, HAL.
Handle:
RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-05009502
DOI: 10.1108/MD-04-2024-0863
Download full text from publisher
To our knowledge, this item is not available for
download. To find whether it is available, there are three
options:
1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's
web page
whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a
search for a similarly titled item that would be
available.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-05009502. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.