IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/halshs-04772265.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Financial, Democratic and Institutional Challenges of the Ecological Transition. What matters most?

Author

Listed:
  • David Cayla

    (GRANEM - Groupe de Recherche Angevin en Economie et Management - UA - Université d'Angers - Institut Agro Rennes Angers - Institut Agro - Institut national d'enseignement supérieur pour l'agriculture, l'alimentation et l'environnement)

Abstract

Green transition often hinges on arguments surrounding the cost of financial transformation. Mainstream economists advocate for a shift toward green finance, coupled with ecological regulations, carbon pricing, and the belief that this will suffice (OECD 2016, Nordhaus 2019). However, many heterodox economists posit that traditional financial systems lack the capacity for such a dramatic shift, emphasizing the need for deeper structural changes in finance, often including alternative monetary policies centered on money creation (Olk et al. 2023, Couppey-Soubeyran et al. 2024). Indeed, the 2008 financial crisis and the COVID pandemic outbreak have shown that when the circumstances require it, monetary policy can break free from its neoliberal principles to save the economy and the productive system. It is not yet clear how far we can go with unconventional economic policies. For decades, our institutional system has been shaped to conform to neoliberal doctrine. Profoundly changing our policies requires transforming informal and formal institutions, as well as public expectations of the role of the states. Consequently, new economic policies cannot be studied from a purely technical point of view. This contribution argues that the ecological transition is less a matter of financial resources and more about allocating physical resources and human labor to goods and services that may not provide immediate gratification to the consumer. From this perspective, the main challenge lies not in economic or financial limitations, but in democratic considerations. New questions need to be addressed by researchers. How can we organize a new economic model that prioritizes ecological investment over consumer comfort, without necessarily resorting to brutal degrowth? How can we make this economic shift socially acceptable, minimizing the potential for populist counter-movements (Polanyi 1944)? What kinds of institutions are preventing us from implementing a profound change in our economic system, and how can we change them? This communication explores these questions by developing a conceptual framework rooted in an institutional perspective. It analyzes the current neoliberal system and proposes potential institutional transformations that could foster an economy that prioritizes environmental well-being and social welfare. References Couppey-Soubeyran, Jézabel, Pierre Delandre and Augustin Sersiron (2024), Le pouvoir de la monnaie, Paris: Les liens qui Libèrent. Nordhaus, William (2019), "Climate Change: The Ultimate Challenge for Economics", American Economic Review, 106(6): 1991-2014. Olk, Christopher, Colleen Schneider and Jason Hickel (2023), "How to pay for saving the world: Modern Monetary Theory for a degrowth transition", Ecological Economics, 214. Polanyi, Karl (1944) [2001], The Great Transformation: The Political and Economic Origins of Our Time, Boston, MA: Beacon Press. OECD (2016), Green Investment Banks: Scaling up Private Investment in Low-carbon, Climate-resilient Infrastructure, Green Finance and Investment, OECD Publishing, Paris.

Suggested Citation

  • David Cayla, 2024. "Financial, Democratic and Institutional Challenges of the Ecological Transition. What matters most?," Post-Print halshs-04772265, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-04772265
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Green transition; Institutional economics;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-04772265. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.