IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/halshs-04692521.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Why Do Chinese and Indian Positions on Climate Differ? Labor Surplus Absorption as a Key Factor

Author

Listed:
  • Pierre Berthaud

    (CREG - Centre de recherche en économie de Grenoble - UGA - Université Grenoble Alpes)

  • Yann Fontana

    (CREG - Centre de recherche en économie de Grenoble - UGA - Université Grenoble Alpes)

  • Laëtitia Guilhot

    (CREG - Centre de recherche en économie de Grenoble - UGA - Université Grenoble Alpes)

Abstract

During international negotiations for the Rio Earth Summit of 1992, coalitions made up of countries from the Global South took shape, only to break up gradually over time. The climate positions of two leading emerging powers, the People's Republic of China and India, have increasingly drifted apart from each other since 2010. This paper seeks to account for this drift by relying on structural factors. The analytical framework proposed here relies on three structural determinants of development: factor endowments, sector specialization, and labor surplus absorption potential. These determinants are complemented by a carbon variable to account for sustainability. This framework reveals a triangle of incompatibility between development, labor surplus absorption, and sustainability that highlights how the People's Republic of China now has sufficient leeway to engage in more ambitious sustainable policies, while India still faces the mutual incompatibility of either pushing forward with economic development or committing to a sustainable agenda.

Suggested Citation

  • Pierre Berthaud & Yann Fontana & Laëtitia Guilhot, 2024. "Why Do Chinese and Indian Positions on Climate Differ? Labor Surplus Absorption as a Key Factor," Post-Print halshs-04692521, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-04692521
    DOI: 10.1142/S0116110524500112
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-04692521. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.