IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/halshs-04665637.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Assessing competition in the European rail freight market: is there an oligopoly?

Author

Listed:
  • Florent Laroche

    (LAET - Laboratoire Aménagement Économie Transports - UL2 - Université Lumière - Lyon 2 - ENTPE - École Nationale des Travaux Publics de l'État - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)

  • Christa Sys

    (UA - University of Antwerp)

  • Thierry Vanelslander

    (UA - University of Antwerp)

  • Eddy van de Voorde

    (UA - University of Antwerp)

Abstract

This paper provides an analysis of the competition for the European rail freight market at the firm level: who are the main players on the European market and what is the current state of the competition? The focus is on a static approach through indicators of concentration from the industrial economy like Herfindahl - Hirschman Index (HHI), the four-firm concentration ratio (CR4) and other. Main results show a high number of active operators on the West European market but a moderate level of concentration (loose oligopoly) with a risk of dominant position by the German incumbent (DB Schenker). They highlight a multiscale problem in terms of regulation with a moderate concentration on the European market, but the persistence of a strong market power from incumbents on their respective national markets. The study provides a new approach of the competition in the rail freight industry dealing with disaggregated data (firm level), a novel database (including newcomers and incumbents), an extended market scope (European level) and indicators usually used in the industrial economy but never for the rail freight industry because of the lack of data.

Suggested Citation

  • Florent Laroche & Christa Sys & Thierry Vanelslander & Eddy van de Voorde, 2019. "Assessing competition in the European rail freight market: is there an oligopoly?," Post-Print halshs-04665637, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-04665637
    DOI: 10.19272/201906702002
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-04665637. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.