IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/halshs-04613742.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Manque de sens au travail ? Un éclairage par la reconnaissance au travail

Author

Listed:
  • Alexis Roche

    (Laboratoire de Recherche Magellan - UJML - Université Jean Moulin - Lyon 3 - Université de Lyon - Institut d'Administration des Entreprises (IAE) - Lyon, ISEOR - Institut de Socio-économie des Entreprises et des ORganisations - Institut de socio-économie des entreprises et des organisations)

Abstract

Meaning at work and recognition are both polysemous concepts. Employees' calls for more work meaning are intertwined with demands for more recognition. The loss of meaning is associated with a loss of identity and a feeling of not existing, not evolving and not making a real society contribution. We explore the contribution work recognition to the loss and creation of meaning, based on our research-intervention experience and the illustration of a case study, a large medical-social association. The article aims to show how, beyond the "crises" evoked in the meaning creation (Weick, 1995), the issue of lack of physiological, relational and rewarding recognition, and in terms of social fulfillment, is detrimental to the work meaning, and even more generally to the individual's life meaning. This question of meaning is fundamental to management. Indeed, in addition to its impact on the mental and physical health of individuals, it has a direct or indirect influence on the organization's economic performance in areas such as: staff turnover, illness, stress, boredom, burn-out, reduced productivity and energy, reduced innovation, errors, levels of cooperation and conflict.

Suggested Citation

  • Alexis Roche, 2024. "Manque de sens au travail ? Un éclairage par la reconnaissance au travail," Post-Print halshs-04613742, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-04613742
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-04613742. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.