IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/halshs-04455314.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Driver survey vs GPS Tour data: Strength and weaknesses of the two sources in order to model the drivers’ journeys

Author

Listed:
  • Florence Toilier

    (LAET - Laboratoire Aménagement Économie Transports - UL2 - Université Lumière - Lyon 2 - ENTPE - École Nationale des Travaux Publics de l'État - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)

  • Mathieu Gardrat

    (LAET - Laboratoire Aménagement Économie Transports - UL2 - Université Lumière - Lyon 2 - ENTPE - École Nationale des Travaux Publics de l'État - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)

Abstract

Large data collection campaigns are difficult to implement in a context of public finance scarcity. This is even more true for goods movements observation, as public authorities' interest in this topic is recent and does not benefit from established survey protocols and modeling tools like those for passenger mobility. The use of GPS devices to capture goods' mobility then appears to be an economic substitute for traditional surveys. By comparing the 2 collection modes on the same tours, this paper provides an overview of the reliability of each mode and proposes processing protocols to make the most of GPS data.

Suggested Citation

  • Florence Toilier & Mathieu Gardrat, 2024. "Driver survey vs GPS Tour data: Strength and weaknesses of the two sources in order to model the drivers’ journeys," Post-Print halshs-04455314, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-04455314
    DOI: 10.1016/j.trpro.2023.12.047
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-04455314. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.