IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/halshs-04259613.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Assessment and economic regulation of transport infrastructures in the case of PPP and PFI

Author

Listed:
  • Alain Bonnafous

    (LAET - Laboratoire Aménagement Économie Transports - UL2 - Université Lumière - Lyon 2 - ENTPE - École Nationale des Travaux Publics de l'État - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, IEP Lyon - Sciences Po Lyon - Institut d'études politiques de Lyon - Université de Lyon)

Abstract

Papers based on systematic literature reviews demonstrate that the scientific literature on PFIs and PPPs have been captured by industrial economics and, more specifically, by the theoretical developments on the principal-agent relationship. We propose in this communication to explore another paradigm, that of identifying the foundations of the public economy that deserve to be revisited in cases of public-private partnership. To do this, we will deal with what we consider to be the main economic controls of a transport policy, which suggests five questions. The WACC being in principle higher in a PPP case, what are the implications for the level of subsidy? Since the WACC is higher in the case of PPP/PFI, under what conditions can this option be profitable for public finances? Is the optimal tariff that which optimizes the welfare function or that which optimizes the income of the private partner? Must the optimal ranking of various projects be based on the socio-economic rate of return (ERR), on the financial internal rate of return (IRR) or on another criterion? What happens to the value for money criterion in the case of the evaluation of a program of several projects?

Suggested Citation

  • Alain Bonnafous, 2023. "Assessment and economic regulation of transport infrastructures in the case of PPP and PFI," Post-Print halshs-04259613, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-04259613
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-04259613. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.