Author
Listed:
- Charlotte Lecuyer
- Mathieu Béal
- Sonia Capelli
(Laboratoire de Recherche Magellan - UJML - Université Jean Moulin - Lyon 3 - Université de Lyon - Institut d'Administration des Entreprises (IAE) - Lyon)
- William Sabadie
(Laboratoire de Recherche Magellan - UJML - Université Jean Moulin - Lyon 3 - Université de Lyon - Institut d'Administration des Entreprises (IAE) - Lyon)
Abstract
Purpose Co-operative managers must invest appropriately to strengthen member relationships, such as by initiating corporate social responsibility (CSR) actions or providing members with more relational benefits. This paper aims to investigate how members' motives (collectivistic vs individualistic) might influence the effectiveness of these investments in terms of enhancing members' trust and loyalty intentions. Design/methodology/approach This research combines an exploratory approach, based on six focus groups, with a confirmatory approach based on a field study and two scenario-based experiments. Findings Members tend to regard the two motives in contest and infer a "more CSR versus more benefits" arbitration effort by co-operatives, such that they appear to prioritize one motive over the other. Members with individualistic motives principally support co-operatives' arbitration toward relational benefits, so the positive effects of CSR initiatives on their trust and loyalty intentions are weaker (Study 1). Both CSR and relational benefits can be more or less efficient, depending on members' motives (Study 2). Research limitations/implications Reflecting their contrasting motives, members infer arbitration by co-operative managers, reflected in their "more CSR versus more benefits" belief. This insight and the related implications for trust and loyalty intentions have not been addressed in prior research. Practical implications Managers can avoid the negative consequences of "more CSR versus more benefits" inferences by ensuring a good fit between their investments and their members' prevailing motives. If members have more collectivistic (cf. individualistic) motives, CSR initiatives (cf. relational benefits) enhance their trust and loyalty intentions more effectively. Originality/value This research builds on previous work on members' relationships within co-operatives and on members' motives. Results find that the effectiveness of co-operatives' investments to strengthen members' loyalty intentions depends on members' prior motives.
Suggested Citation
Charlotte Lecuyer & Mathieu Béal & Sonia Capelli & William Sabadie, 2022.
"“More CSR versus more benefits”: how members' motives influence loyalty toward cooperatives,"
Post-Print
halshs-03919287, HAL.
Handle:
RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-03919287
DOI: 10.1108/EJM-01-2021-0011
Download full text from publisher
To our knowledge, this item is not available for
download. To find whether it is available, there are three
options:
1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's
web page
whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a
search for a similarly titled item that would be
available.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-03919287. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.