IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/halshs-03781917.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Un système de retraite universel par points serait-il plus juste socialement ? Éléments d’évaluation des principaux enjeux de la réforme Macron/Delevoye

Author

Listed:
  • Arnaud Lechevalier

    (LISE - Laboratoire interdisciplinaire pour la sociologie économique - CNAM - Conservatoire National des Arts et Métiers [CNAM] - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, UP1 - Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne)

Abstract

Distribution électronique Cairn.info pour Presses de Sciences Po. © Presses de Sciences Po. Tous droits réservés pour tous pays. La reproduction ou représentation de cet article, notamment par photocopie, n'est autorisée que dans les limites des conditions générales d'utilisation du site ou, le cas échéant, des conditions générales de la licence souscrite par votre établissement. Toute autre reproduction ou représentation, en tout ou partie, sous quelque forme et de quelque manière que ce soit, est interdite sauf accord préalable et écrit de l'éditeur, en dehors des cas prévus par la législation en vigueur en France. Il est précisé que son stockage dans une base de données est également interdit.

Suggested Citation

  • Arnaud Lechevalier, 2021. "Un système de retraite universel par points serait-il plus juste socialement ? Éléments d’évaluation des principaux enjeux de la réforme Macron/Delevoye," Post-Print halshs-03781917, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-03781917
    DOI: 10.3917/sopr.041.0099
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://shs.hal.science/halshs-03781917v1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://shs.hal.science/halshs-03781917v1/document
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.3917/sopr.041.0099?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. repec:dau:papers:123456789/4778 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Jean Hindriks & Pierre Devolder & Erik Schokkaert & Frank Vandenbroucke, 2017. "Réforme des pensions légales : le système de pension à points," Regards économiques 130, Université catholique de Louvain, Institut de Recherches Economiques et Sociales (IRES).
    3. Antoine Bozio & Chloé Lallemand & Simon Rabaté & Audrey Rain, 2019. "Réforme des retraites : quels effets redistributifs attendus ?," Post-Print halshs-02516412, HAL.
    4. Henri Sterdyniak, 2009. "Retraites : à la recherche de solutions miracles..," Revue de l'OFCE, Presses de Sciences-Po, vol. 0(2), pages 109-140.
    5. repec:hal:spmain:info:hdl:2441/5l6uh8ogmqildh09h85pkh442 is not listed on IDEAS
    6. repec:hal:wpspec:info:hdl:2441/5l6uh8ogmqildh09h85pkh442 is not listed on IDEAS
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Catherine Bac & Samia Benallah, 2016. "Glissement de la norme de contributivité au régime général d'assurance-vieillesse : une estimation des effets potentiels sur le niveau des pensions," Post-Print hal-02968979, HAL.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-03781917. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.