IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/halshs-02301958.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Dissuasive cigarettes: which cues are the most effective at deterring young people from smoking?

Author

Listed:
  • K. Gallopel-Morvan

    (EHESP - École des Hautes Études en Santé Publique [EHESP], EA MOS - EA Management des Organisations de Santé - EHESP - École des Hautes Études en Santé Publique [EHESP] - PRES Sorbonne Paris Cité, IDM - Institut du Management - EHESP - École des Hautes Études en Santé Publique [EHESP])

  • O. Droulers

    (CREM - Centre de recherche en économie et management - UNICAEN - Université de Caen Normandie - NU - Normandie Université - UR - Université de Rennes - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)

  • Gaelle Pantin-Sohier

    (GRANEM - Groupe de Recherche Angevin en Economie et Management - UA - Université d'Angers - AGROCAMPUS OUEST - Institut National de l'Horticulture et du Paysage)

Abstract

ObjectivesTo counter the attractiveness of cigarettes, Article 11 of the Framework Convention on Tobacco Control provides for the possibility of including warnings on cigarettes. The objective of our research was to explore perceptions of cigarettes designed to be dissuasive (displaying the warning ‘Smoking kills' in uppercase or lowercase, a ‘skull and crossbones' pictogram, unattractive shades of brown or dark green or a combination of all these negative cues).Study designIn-depth interviews were conducted with 31 people in France aged 15–25 years (10 daily smokers, 10 occasional smokers and 11 non-smokers; 15 females and 16 males).MethodsParticipants were shown different dissuasive cigarettes (displaying the warning ‘Smoking kills', a ‘skull and crossbones' pictogram, unattractive shades of brown or dark green or a combination of all three) and current branded ones. Open-ended questions were asked about the attractiveness of the cigarettes, perception of risk, the image of the smoker and influence on the desire to quit or not to start. Discussions were audio-recorded and transcribed.ResultsThe different dissuasive cues were found to increase negative health perceptions (e.g., increase risk), reduce positive smoker image and the perceived pleasure of smoking (e.g., embarrassment of smoking in front of friends), decrease the desire to start smoking and increase the desire to quit. The most dissuasive cigarette was an unattractively dark-coloured cigarette which displayed both the warning ‘Smoking kills' and a ‘skull and crossbones' pictogram.ConclusionThis study highlights the importance of the appearance of cigarettes and suggests that dissuasive cigarettes may be an innovative tobacco control measure for governments.

Suggested Citation

  • K. Gallopel-Morvan & O. Droulers & Gaelle Pantin-Sohier, 2019. "Dissuasive cigarettes: which cues are the most effective at deterring young people from smoking?," Post-Print halshs-02301958, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-02301958
    DOI: 10.1016/j.puhe.2019.05.034
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://shs.hal.science/halshs-02301958
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://shs.hal.science/halshs-02301958/document
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.puhe.2019.05.034?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Amos, Amanda & Gray, David & Currie, Candace & Elton, Rob, 1997. "Healthy or druggy? Self-image, ideal image and smoking behaviour among young people," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 45(6), pages 847-858, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Stead, Martine & McDermott, Laura & MacKintosh, Anne Marie & Adamson, Ashley, 2011. "Why healthy eating is bad for young people's health: Identity, belonging and food," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 72(7), pages 1131-1139, April.
    2. Hoek, Janet & Newcombe, Rhiannon & Walker, Sue, 2011. "Promoting youth smokefree behaviour: An evaluation of a social norms campaign," Australasian marketing journal, Elsevier, vol. 19(1), pages 58-64.
    3. Kent Smetters & Jennifer Gravelle, 2001. "The Exchange Theory of Teenage Smoking and the Counterproductiveness of Moderate Regulation," NBER Working Papers 8262, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Tobacco Dissuasive cigarette Warnings;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-02301958. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.