IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/halshs-01961207.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

La définition des indicateurs sociaux, entre recherche d’objectivation et enjeux de pouvoir : le cas de l’égalité professionnelle

Author

Listed:
  • Clotilde Coron

    (LAB IAE Paris - Sorbonne - IAE Paris - Sorbonne Business School)

Abstract

One of the main historical obligations concerning gender equality for companies consists in publishing an annual report about gender equality. This report contains legal indicators, but also indicators defined with labor unions. This paper uses concepts from the sociology of quantification and the theoretical frame of the appropriative perspective of management tools to study the process of defining those indicators. The aim conferred to those indicators, which are an important issue in the collective bargaining, is to detect inequalities, but they also crystallize power issues. Therefore, they are not neutral reflects of realty: the indicators defined during the collective bargaining are the result of the will to access information, and of the power balance between Direction and labor unions. Finally, using the indicators necessitates a learning process which remains insufficient at the local level.

Suggested Citation

  • Clotilde Coron, 2018. "La définition des indicateurs sociaux, entre recherche d’objectivation et enjeux de pouvoir : le cas de l’égalité professionnelle," Post-Print halshs-01961207, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-01961207
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://shs.hal.science/halshs-01961207
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://shs.hal.science/halshs-01961207/document
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. repec:hal:spmain:info:hdl:2441/5l6uh8ogmqildh09h52b3b0kh is not listed on IDEAS
    2. repec:dau:papers:123456789/12463 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Françoise Milewski, 2010. "Pourquoi les politiques publiques sont-elles si peu suivies d'effets ?. Quelques interrogations," Revue de l'OFCE, Presses de Sciences-Po, vol. 0(3), pages 291-318.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-01961207. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.