IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/halshs-01673865.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

What Comes before a Digital Output? Eliciting and Documenting Cultural Heritage Research Processes

Author

Listed:
  • Iwona Dudek

    (MAP - Modèles et simulations pour l'Architecture et le Patrimoine - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique - MC - Ministère de la Culture)

  • Jean-Yves Blaise

    (MAP - Modèles et simulations pour l'Architecture et le Patrimoine - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique - MC - Ministère de la Culture)

Abstract

— Knowledge-based systems, are today part of many research protocols where they act as powerful means to model, implement and cross-examine the workflows that lead from a set of inputs to a set of outputs. They remain however tricky to apply in the specific context of heritage science where workflows include a long tail of subjective human decisions, of non-explicit research protocols, of poorly formalised pieces of knowledge, of highly individual skills, of undocumented, non-reproducible, intuitive interpretations, when not simply of licentia artistica. Yet the heritage science community has witnessed over the past decades the emergence of huge quantities of digital outputs, either following massive digitization efforts, or as a result of the growing capacity of actors to produce digital-born material. How can this move be supported in terms of reproducibility, reusability and cross-examination of results if research protocols remain non-formalised one-shot efforts? The research presented in this paper bases on the idea that what should be formalised and shared with future generations are not end results alone (outputs) but the methods and processes that lead the making of the output (human skills, tools, technological procedures, cognitive processes, scientific protocols, etc.). Our contribution addresses a pending issue: how can we today complement traditional approaches to heritage assets documentation with means to describe and record research processes and workflows? The infrastructure we propose raises knowledge representation, visualisation, and information management issues. It applies primarily to a range of specific cultural heritage related artefacts, but is expected to be fairly generic in terms of methodology. In this paper we describe the methods employed in order to elicit underlying activities, support team elicitation through ad-hoc visualisations, promote a consistent visual interfacing of the underlying Information System.

Suggested Citation

  • Iwona Dudek & Jean-Yves Blaise, 2017. "What Comes before a Digital Output? Eliciting and Documenting Cultural Heritage Research Processes," Post-Print halshs-01673865, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-01673865
    DOI: 10.18178/ijch.2017.3.1.083
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://shs.hal.science/halshs-01673865
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://shs.hal.science/halshs-01673865/document
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.18178/ijch.2017.3.1.083?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Claire McInerney, 2002. "Knowledge management and the dynamic nature of knowledge," Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 53(12), pages 1009-1018, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sara Alonzo, 2022. "Organizational Values and Knowledge Sharing in Public Institution: Economic-Public Sector in Guatemala," Digital Transformation: The Harmonic Convergence of People, Culture, Process, and Technology in the New Normal,, ToKnowPress.
    2. Bibi Alajmi & Talal Alhaji, 2018. "Mapping the Field of Knowledge Management: Bibliometric and Content Analysis of Journal of Information & Knowledge Management for the Period from 2002–2016," Journal of Information & Knowledge Management (JIKM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 17(03), pages 1-16, September.
    3. Mohajan, Haradhan, 2016. "Sharing of Tacit Knowledge in Organizations: A Review," MPRA Paper 82958, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 15 Jun 2016.
    4. Dimitris Tsintsaris & Milan Tsompanoglou & Evangelos Ioannidis, 2024. "Dynamics of Social Influence and Knowledge in Networks: Sociophysics Models and Applications in Social Trading, Behavioral Finance and Business," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-27, April.
    5. Ghabban, Fahad & Selamat, Ali & Ibrahim, Roliana, 2018. "New model for encouraging academic staff in Saudi universities to use IT for knowledge sharing to improve scholarly publication performance," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 92-99.
    6. Swapnil Dhamal & Y. Narahari, 2015. "Formation of Stable Strategic Networks with Desired Topologies," Studies in Microeconomics, , vol. 3(2), pages 158-213, December.
    7. Joon Hyung Cho & So Young Sohn, 0. "Competing risk model for predicting stabilization period of university spin-off ventures," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-20.
    8. Barão, Alexandre & de Vasconcelos, José Braga & Rocha, Álvaro & Pereira, Ruben, 2017. "A knowledge management approach to capture organizational learning networks," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 37(6), pages 735-740.
    9. IANCU, Eugenia & SOCACIU, Tiberiu, 2014. "Knowledge, Economic Models And Market Value Of Companies," Journal of Financial and Monetary Economics, Centre of Financial and Monetary Research "Victor Slavescu", vol. 1(1), pages 203-209.
    10. D. Mehta & Naveen K Mehta & Jitendra K. Sharma, 2011. "Knowledge Management in Economic Downturn: Indian Scenario," BRAND. Broad Research in Accounting, Negotiation, and Distribution, EduSoft Publishing, vol. 2(2), pages 16-21, October.
    11. Jankit Chotigo & Yasuo Kadono, 2021. "Were There Any Key Factors That Encourage Food Delivery Apps Adoption before the Covid-19 Pandemic in Thailand," Economy for a New Normal: Digitalisation and Human Relations in Business and Education,, ToKnowPress.
    12. Hugo Pinto & Jorge André Guerreiro & Manuel Fernández-Esquinas, 2023. "Sources of knowledge in the firm: a review on influential, internal and contextual factors in innovation dynamics," SN Business & Economics, Springer, vol. 3(2), pages 1-32, February.
    13. Yang Cai & Youming Song & Xia Xiao & Wendian Shi, 2020. "The Effect of Social Capital on Tacit Knowledge-Sharing Intention: The Mediating Role of Employee Vigor," SAGE Open, , vol. 10(3), pages 21582440209, July.
    14. Patient Rambe & Mpho Agnes Mbeo, 2017. "Technology-Enhanced Knowledge Management Framework for Retaining Research Knowledge among University Academics," Journal of Economics and Behavioral Studies, AMH International, vol. 9(1), pages 189-206.
    15. Pearce, Antony & Pons, Dirk & Neitzert, Thomas, 2018. "Implementing lean—Outcomes from SME case studies," Operations Research Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 5(C), pages 94-104.
    16. Joon Hyung Cho & So Young Sohn, 2017. "Competing risk model for predicting stabilization period of university spin-off ventures," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 13(3), pages 777-796, September.
    17. Yinian Gu, 2004. "Global knowledge management research: A bibliometric analysis," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 61(2), pages 171-190, October.
    18. Antony Pearce & Dirk Pons & Thomas Neitzert, 2023. "Understanding Lean—Statistical Analysis of Perceptions and Self-Deception Regarding Lean Management," SN Operations Research Forum, Springer, vol. 4(2), pages 1-43, June.
    19. Zihanxin Li & Ting Wan & Jing Lan, 2022. "Substitution or Complementarity: Influence of Industry–University–Research-Institute Cooperation Governance Mechanism on Knowledge Transfer—An Empirical Analysis from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-24, June.
    20. Roxanne Helm Stevens & Joshua Millage & Sondra Clark, 2010. "Waves of Knowledge Management: The Flow between Explicit and Tacit Knowledge," American Journal of Economics and Business Administration, Science Publications, vol. 2(1), pages 129-135, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-01673865. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.