IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/halshs-01451372.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Social entrepreneur, social entrepreneurship and social enterprise: semantics and controversies

Author

Listed:
  • Francesca Petrella

    (LEST - Laboratoire d'Economie et de Sociologie du Travail - AMU - Aix Marseille Université - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)

  • Nadine Richez-Battesti

    (LEST - Laboratoire d'Economie et de Sociologie du Travail - AMU - Aix Marseille Université - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)

Abstract

Social entrepreneurship is commonly used to qualify all entrepreneurial initiatives that serve a social and/or environmental mission and that reinvest a large part of their surpluses in support of their mission. Although this defi- nition is not yet stabilised and its boundaries remain unclear, it focuses on the aim of achieving both economic efficiency and social purpose (Austin et al., 2006; Moulaert et al., 2013). It took place within a context of economic crisis and unemployement in the 1980s and of great uncertainty about the future of Welfare States and their capacity to meet new societal needs. The financial and budgetary constraints that most countries are facing force public authorities to develop new forms of interaction between public and private sectors and to build new responses to societal challenges that are sustainable, socially, economically and environmentally. Within this con- text, all sorts of initiatives that answer new social needs, often described as social innovations are gaining interest. Social entrepreneurship is often associated with social innovation since social entrepreneurs are searching for innovative solutions to meet these new needs. Recent works (Moulaert et al., 2013), in the continuation of the analyses realised in Québec (Klein, Harrisson, 2007), consider that social innovation "is not only a descriptor for a set of practices but an emerging phenomenon, a theoretical construct and an on- going field of research within a world of social transformation" (p. 2). Although interest in social entrepreneurship seems to be recent, the first works on social entrepreneurship are found in the 1980s. While social entrepreneurship is still a phenomenon not well bounded theoretically, it is becoming an important economic reality at a large scale, both in the US and in Europe, given its capacity to reconcile private and social value creation. This paper is structured as follows. The first section discusses the differ- ent notions used in the literature, sometimes indiscriminately, hiding some important differences and controversial issues. These notions are social entrepreneurship, social entrepreneur and social enterprise. The second section identifies the main elements of controversy between the different approaches to social entrepreneurship, social entrepeneur and social enter- prise that we have identified.

Suggested Citation

  • Francesca Petrella & Nadine Richez-Battesti, 2014. "Social entrepreneur, social entrepreneurship and social enterprise: semantics and controversies," Post-Print halshs-01451372, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-01451372
    DOI: 10.3917/jie.014.0143
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Guillaume Denos & Christophe Maurel & François Pantin, 2020. "Raising awareness about paradoxes: the case of a participatory device facing social innovation tensions," Post-Print hal-03274464, HAL.
    2. Inmaculada Buendía-Martínez & Inmaculada Carrasco Monteagudo, 2020. "The Role of CSR on Social Entrepreneurship: An International Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-22, August.
    3. Aydin Kayabasi & Ceren Karavelioglu & N. Derya Ergun Ozler, 2021. "The Effect of Institutional Environment, General SelfEfficacy and Desirability On Social Entrepreneurship Intentions in Turkey," Istanbul Business Research, Istanbul University Business School, vol. 50(2), pages 411-434, November.
    4. Shah Muhammad Kamran & Mahvish Kanwal Khaskhely & Abdelmohsen A. Nassani & Mohamed Haffar & Muhammad Moinuddin Qazi Abro, 2022. "Social Entrepreneurship Opportunities via Distant Socialization and Social Value Creation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-25, March.
    5. Guillaume Denos & Christophe Maurel & François Pantin, 2020. "Raising awareness about paradoxes: the case of a participatory device facing social innovation tensions," Post-Print hal-03274408, HAL.
    6. Nadina Helen BAKOS, 2021. "How independent science can contribute to the field of social entrepreneurship in Scandinavia," Access Journal, Access Press Publishing House, vol. 2(2), pages 192-202, May.
    7. de Lange, Deborah & Valliere, Dave, 2020. "Investor preferences between the sharing economy and incumbent firms," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 37-47.
    8. Almeida Fernando, 2021. "Open Data’s Role in Social Innovation Initiatives to Fight COVID-19," Journal of Management and Business Administration. Central Europe, Sciendo, vol. 29(3), pages 2-19, September.
    9. Ermanno C. Tortia & Florence Degavre & Simone Poledrini, 2020. "Why are social enterprises good candidates for social innovation? Looking for personal and institutional drivers of innovation," Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 91(3), pages 459-477, September.
    10. Marco Socci & David Clarke & Andrea Principi, 2020. "Active Aging: Social Entrepreneuring in Local Communities of Five European Countries," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(7), pages 1-19, April.
    11. Soogwan Doh, 2020. "Social Entrepreneurship and Regional Economic Development: The Case of Social Enterprise in South Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-20, October.
    12. Céline Merlin-Brogniart & Lars Fuglsang & Ada Scupola & Anne Vorre Hansen & Rolf Rønning & Siv Magnussen & Alberto Peralta & Miklós Rosta & Márton Katona & Éva Révész, 2021. "Public Service Innovation Network for Social Innovation: A European overview," Post-Print halshs-03333560, HAL.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Social enterprise; social entrepreneurship;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-01451372. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.