IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/halshs-00680314.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Ethique et parties prenantes. Les enjeux philosophiques

Author

Listed:
  • José Allouche

    (IAE Paris - Sorbonne Business School)

  • Olivier Charpateau

    (DRM - Dauphine Recherches en Management - Université Paris Dauphine-PSL - PSL - Université Paris Sciences et Lettres - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)

Abstract

Le terme d'éthique est devenu au fil des vingt dernières années un mot commun, dont le sens dépend de son utilisateur et régulièrement mobilisé dans le champ du management. Il est particulièrement prisé pour parler du comportement des entreprises vis-à-vis de ses partenaires et de ses salariés. La séparation entre propriété et décision a servi de point de départ à une analyse qui oscille entre juridisme et économisme pour définir les logiques de responsabilité de et dans l'entreprise. La théorie des parties prenantes s'est construite alors sur le constat que l'entreprise ne peut se limiter à rendre des comptes aux seuls actionnaires en maximisant le profit redistribué. La mise en perspective des textes fondamentaux sur les parties prenantes avec les courants philosophiques portant sur l'éthique permet l'émergence de plusieurs constats et questionnements.

Suggested Citation

  • José Allouche & Olivier Charpateau, 2012. "Ethique et parties prenantes. Les enjeux philosophiques," Post-Print halshs-00680314, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-00680314
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://shs.hal.science/halshs-00680314
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://shs.hal.science/halshs-00680314/document
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sanaa Ait Daoud & Amélie Bohas, 2013. "Technologies de l'Information (TI) et Développement Durable (DD) : Revue de la littérature et pistes de réflexion," Post-Print hal-00813608, HAL.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    propriété; responsabilité sociale; utilitarisme; valeurs; éthique; parties prenantes;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-00680314. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.