IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/halshs-00679575.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

L'identification du capital immatériel dans les états financiers : problématique et enjeux

Author

Listed:
  • Inès Bouden

    (IRG - Institut de Recherche en Gestion - UPEM - Université Paris-Est Marne-la-Vallée - UPEC UP12 - Université Paris-Est Créteil Val-de-Marne - Paris 12)

  • Jean-François Casta

    (DRM-Finance - DRM - Dauphine Recherches en Management - Université Paris Dauphine-PSL - PSL - Université Paris Sciences et Lettres - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)

Abstract

Dans le monde économique actuel, la valeur d'une entreprise repose, pour une grande part, sur sa capacité à utiliser et à produire du capital immatériel (brevets, les marques dépenses de R&D, savoir-faire, réputation, satisfaction client, capital humain ou capital organisationnel ...). Cependant, ces ressources incorporelles engendrent de nombreuses difficultés conceptuelles au niveau de leur identification comme actifs par le modèle comptable de représentation de l'entreprise. Au regard d'une perte de pertinence de l'information comptable pour les utilisateurs, qui se traduit sur les marchés financiers par une baisse tendancielle du Book-to-Market Ratio, les normalisateurs (comme l'IASB et le FASB) ont mis en oeuvre un processus de reconnaissance comptable de certains éléments constitutifs du capital immatériel. Après avoir présenté une typologie des ressources incorporelles mobilisées par l'entreprise, nous examinerons le rôle joué par différents acteurs (régulateur de marché, préparateurs de comptes, directeurs financiers de sociétés cotées, commissaires aux comptes) lors de regroupements d'entreprises (fusions, acquisitions, apports partiels, ...) au regard de l'ampleur et de la nature des éléments incorporels reconnus. En effet, parties prenantes au processus d'élaboration des états financiers, la confrontation de leurs arguments respectifs conduit, dans un cadre réglementaire donné, à façonner la reconnaissance des incorporels acquis. Les normalisateurs, en souhaitant redonner de la pertinence à l'information comptable, ont développé un vaste débat, autour du goodwill et de l'allocation du prix d'acquisition, qui pose le problème des objectifs des états financiers et de l'utilité de l'information comptable

Suggested Citation

  • Inès Bouden & Jean-François Casta, 2013. "L'identification du capital immatériel dans les états financiers : problématique et enjeux," Post-Print halshs-00679575, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-00679575
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://shs.hal.science/halshs-00679575
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://shs.hal.science/halshs-00679575/document
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Corinne Bessieux-Ollier & Élisabeth Walliser, 2007. "La transition et le bilan de la première application en France des normes IFRS : le cas des incorporels," Comptabilité - Contrôle - Audit, Association francophone de comptabilité, vol. 13(3), pages 219-245.
    2. Henry G. Grabowksi & Dennis C. Mueller, 1978. "Industrial Research and Development, Intangible Capital Stocks, and Firm Profit Rates," Bell Journal of Economics, The RAND Corporation, vol. 9(2), pages 328-343, Autumn.
    3. Corinne Bessieux-Ollier & Élisabeth Walliser, 2007. "La transition et le bilan de la première application en France des normes IFRS : le cas des incorporels," Post-Print halshs-00526912, HAL.
    4. Jean-François Casta & Luc Paugam, 2010. "Mesurer le capital organisationnel comme combinaison de ressources," Post-Print hal-00680410, HAL.
    5. Yvonne Giordano, 2003. "Conduire un projet de recherche. Une perspective qualitative," Post-Print halshs-00440011, HAL.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nour Malijebtou Hassine & Faouzi Jilani, 2017. "Earnings Management Behavior with Respect to Goodwill Impairment Losses under IAS 36: The French Case," International Journal of Academic Research in Accounting, Finance and Management Sciences, Human Resource Management Academic Research Society, International Journal of Academic Research in Accounting, Finance and Management Sciences, vol. 7(2), pages 177-196, April.
    2. Jean-Michael Sahut & Sandrine Boulerne, 2010. "Have Ias (International Accounting Standards)/Ifrs Improved The Information Content Of Intangibles In France ?," Post-Print hal-02104906, HAL.
    3. Jean‐Michel Sahut & Sandrine Boulerne & Frédéric Teulon, 2011. "Do IFRS provide better information about intangibles in Europe?," Review of Accounting and Finance, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 10(3), pages 267-290, August.
    4. Corinne Bessieux-Ollier & Marie Chavent & Vanessa Kuentz & Elisabeth Walliser, 2012. "The mandatory adoption of IFRS on intangibles: upheaval or inertia? The case of France," International Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Performance Evaluation, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 8(1), pages 91-113.
    5. Angelique Ngaha Bah, 2012. "Corporate Social Responsibility and the Public Service: which articulations ? the case of France Telecom [RSE et Service Public : quelle(s) articulation(s) ? Le cas de l’entreprise France Télécom]," Post-Print hal-01688157, HAL.
    6. Pietro Moncada-Paternò-Castello, 2022. "Top R&D investors, structural change and the R&D growth performance of young and old firms," Eurasian Business Review, Springer;Eurasia Business and Economics Society, vol. 12(1), pages 1-33, March.
    7. Levine, Oliver, 2017. "Acquiring growth," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 126(2), pages 300-319.
    8. Kaiser, Ulrich, 2009. "Patents and profit rates," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 104(2), pages 79-80, August.
    9. Patricia M. Danzon & Eric L. Keuffel, 2014. "Regulation of the Pharmaceutical-Biotechnology Industry," NBER Chapters, in: Economic Regulation and Its Reform: What Have We Learned?, pages 407-484, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    10. François Fulconis & Jérôme Joubert, 2017. "Compétitivité et réseau public d’offre de soins : des Communautés Hospitalières de Territoire aux Groupements Hospitaliers de Territoire," Post-Print hal-01790127, HAL.
    11. Jinhee Kwon & Cheong Kim & Kun Chang Lee, 2020. "Moderating Effect of the Continental Factor on the Business Strategy and M&A Performance in the Pharmaceutical Industry for Sustainable International Business," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-14, June.
    12. Jaideep Chowdhury & Gokhan Sonaer, 2015. "Investment and Managerial Preferences," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 35(1), pages 392-399.
    13. Gleason, Katherine I. & Klock, Mark, 2006. "Intangible capital in the pharmaceutical and chemical industry," The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 46(2), pages 300-314, May.
    14. Christophe, Stephen E. & Lee, Hun, 2005. "What matters about internationalization: a market-based assessment," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 58(5), pages 636-643, May.
    15. Charles R. Hulten & Xiaohui Hao, 2008. "What is a Company Really Worth? Intangible Capital and the "Market to Book Value" Puzzle," NBER Working Papers 14548, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    16. Kornelius Kraft & Jörg Stank & Ralf Dewenter, 2011. "Co-determination and innovation," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 35(1), pages 145-172.
    17. Patrick Ifergan, 2011. "Interprétativisme et complexité des normes d'audit françaises," Post-Print hal-00650464, HAL.
    18. Petr Hanel & Alain St-Pierre, 2002. "Effects of R & D Spillovers on the Profitability of Firms," Review of Industrial Organization, Springer;The Industrial Organization Society, vol. 20(4), pages 305-322, June.
    19. Andréa Gourmelen & Bertrand Urien & Marine Le Gall-Ely, 2016. "Ultimate time pressure: Conceptualisation and measurement," Post-Print hal-01904355, HAL.
    20. Yuan Ding & Hervé Stolowy & Michel Tenenhaus, 2003. "R&D productivity: an international study," Working Papers hal-00591685, HAL.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-00679575. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.