IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/halshs-00582811.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Réputation de l'auditeur et modèle de gouvernance : une comparaison France, Allemagne, Canada

Author

Listed:
  • Charles Piot

    (Service de l'enseignement des sciences comptables - HEC Montréal - HEC Montréal)

Abstract

Ce papier montre que les déterminants de la réputation de l'auditeur sont sensibles aux modèles de gouvernance nationaux. En France, la propension à présenter des comptes certifiés par un cabinet anglo-saxon augmente avec les coûts d'agence actionnaires-créanciers. Au Canada, cette propension résulte davantage d'une demande d'assurance sur l'auditeur (deep pockets). En Allemagne, aucune des hypothèses d'agence ou d'assurance n'est corroborée.

Suggested Citation

  • Charles Piot, 2003. "Réputation de l'auditeur et modèle de gouvernance : une comparaison France, Allemagne, Canada," Post-Print halshs-00582811, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-00582811
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://shs.hal.science/halshs-00582811
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://shs.hal.science/halshs-00582811/document
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-00582811. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.