IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/halshs-00170582.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

R&D productivity: an exploratory international study

Author

Listed:
  • Hervé Stolowy

    (GREGH - Groupement de Recherche et d'Etudes en Gestion à HEC - HEC Paris - Ecole des Hautes Etudes Commerciales - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)

  • Michel Tenenhaus

    (GREGH - Groupement de Recherche et d'Etudes en Gestion à HEC - HEC Paris - Ecole des Hautes Etudes Commerciales - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)

  • Yuan Ding

Abstract

Design/methodology/approach – The research design is based on an earnings equationassociating earnings with recorded assets, R&D expenditures and selling, general and administrativeexpenses (proxying for advertising expenses). The paper determines a rate of return on R&D for eachgiven sample of firms in six developed countries.Findings – The results corroborate previous studies of American companies, which found thatreported earnings, adjusted for expensing of R&D, reflect realized benefits from R&D. This studyprovides further evidence on the positive contribution of R&D activities to future companyperformance, although this contribution can vary from one country to another.Research limitations/implications – Being exploratory in nature, this paper suggests severalareas for investigation.Originality/value – With the exception of some American studies, the economic effectiveness ofinvestment in R&D is seldom demonstrated explicitly by the literature, and to the best of ourknowledge, there are no existing studies on R&D productivity taking an international approach

Suggested Citation

  • Hervé Stolowy & Michel Tenenhaus & Yuan Ding, 2007. "R&D productivity: an exploratory international study," Post-Print halshs-00170582, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-00170582
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Other versions of this item:

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Annette Ptok & Rupinder P. Jindal & Werner J. Reinartz, 2018. "Selling, general, and administrative expense (SGA)-based metrics in marketing: conceptual and measurement challenges," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 46(6), pages 987-1011, November.
    2. Nourhene BLIBECH & Sarra Berraies, 2018. "The impact of CEO' duality and board's size and independence on firms’ innovation and financial performance," E3 Journal of Business Management and Economics., E3 Journals, vol. 9(1), pages 022-029.
    3. Cristina CRISTE & Ciel BOVARY (MAN) & Nicoleta-Claudia MOLDOVAN & Raluca RĂCĂTĂIAN & Oana-Ramona LOBONȚ, 2024. "Eu Capacity To Bolster And Stimulate Research And Innovation: Who Is The Leader In Development?," Studies in Business and Economics, Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu, Faculty of Economic Sciences, vol. 19(2), pages 60-77, August.
    4. Gong, James Jianxin & Wang, Sophia I-Ling, 2016. "Changes in the value relevance of research and development expenses after IFRS adoption," Advances in accounting, Elsevier, vol. 35(C), pages 49-61.
    5. repec:asi:ajoerj:2014:p:468-487 is not listed on IDEAS
    6. Christophe Pennetier & Karan Girotra & Jürgen Mihm, 2019. "R&D Spending: Dynamic or Persistent?," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 21(3), pages 636-657, July.
    7. repec:dau:papers:123456789/2641 is not listed on IDEAS
    8. Peng Zou & Qi Wang & Jinhong Xie & Chenxi Zhou, 2020. "Does doing good lead to doing better in emerging markets? Stock market responses to the SRI index announcements in Brazil, China, and South Africa," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 48(5), pages 966-986, September.
    9. Efstathios G. Parcharidis & Nikos C. Varsakelis, 2010. "R&D and Tobin's q in an emerging financial market: the case of the Athens Stock Exchange," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(5), pages 353-361.
    10. Jean-François Casta & Olivier J. Ramond & Lionel Escaffre, 2008. "Economic Properties of Recognized Intangibles under Domestic Accounting Standards: Evidence from European Capital Markets," Post-Print halshs-00681592, HAL.
    11. Chong Yu & Samuel DiGangi & Angel Jannasch-Pennell, 2012. "A Time-Lag Analysis of the Relationships Among PISA Scores, Scientific Research Publication, and Economic Performance," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 107(2), pages 317-330, June.
    12. Jean-Michael Sahut & Sandrine Boulerne, 2010. "Have Ias (International Accounting Standards)/Ifrs Improved The Information Content Of Intangibles In France ?," Post-Print hal-02104906, HAL.
    13. Orbach Yair & Fruchter Gila E., 2010. "A Utility-Based Diffusion Model Applied to the Digital Camera Case," Review of Marketing Science, De Gruyter, vol. 8(1), pages 1-28, June.
    14. Kamran Ahmed & John Hillier & Elisabeth Tanusasmita, 2011. "R&D profitability, intensity and market‐to‐book: evidence from Australia," Accounting Research Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 24(2), pages 150-177, September.
    15. Guy D. Fernando & Qiao Xu, 2012. "CEO compensation and strategic expenses: penalizing, shielding or rewarding?," Review of Accounting and Finance, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 11(3), pages 279-297, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-00170582. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.