IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/halshs-00150299.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

« Are Corporate Governance Systems Typologies Relevant? »

Author

Listed:
  • Sylvie Cieply

    (CREM - Centre de recherche en économie et management - UNICAEN - Université de Caen Normandie - NU - Normandie Université - UR - Université de Rennes - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)

  • Anne-Laure Le Nadant

    (CREM - Centre de recherche en économie et management - UNICAEN - Université de Caen Normandie - NU - Normandie Université - UR - Université de Rennes - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)

  • Rafik Abdesselam

    (CREM - Centre de recherche en économie et management - UNICAEN - Université de Caen Normandie - NU - Normandie Université - UR - Université de Rennes - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)

Abstract

Corporate governance systems vary considerably across Europe, reflecting the differences in the financial and legal systems, and in corporate ownership structures. The purpose of this paper is to identify the relevant governance system typologies. To test the robustness of the typologies, we study transfers of ownership rights that may be an important determinant of corporate governance in the largest European economies. Results overall invalidate the expectations induced from the theoretical analysis of national corporate governance systems. They suggest that the classical typologies are insufficient to distinguish between governance systems as they miss to capture institutional complementarities and political differences. Our unexpected results could also suggest a convergence of the systems, not towards the Anglo-American model, but towards a new model.

Suggested Citation

  • Sylvie Cieply & Anne-Laure Le Nadant & Rafik Abdesselam, 2007. "« Are Corporate Governance Systems Typologies Relevant? »," Post-Print halshs-00150299, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-00150299
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-00150299. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.