IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/halshs-00119591.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Measurement of the reliability of sensory panel performances

Author

Listed:
  • Michel Tenenhaus

    (GREGH - Groupement de Recherche et d'Etudes en Gestion à HEC - HEC Paris - Ecole des Hautes Etudes Commerciales - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)

  • L. Ambroisine
  • C. Guinot
  • J. Latreille
  • E. Mauger
  • M. Vincent
  • S. Navarro

Abstract

A reliable panel is required in sensory analysis. The purpose of this paper is to propose a new methodology based on a mixed linear model to test various criteria of a panel's reliability. The developed method allows testing the global performance of the panel, and the individual performances of each judge in terms of discriminability and repeatability, severity or laxity, and agreement or disagreement with the panel. All the computations are implemented in an SAS® program. The results of the analysis are summarised in a set of tables in such a way that the panel leader can easily check and compare the judge performances.

Suggested Citation

  • Michel Tenenhaus & L. Ambroisine & C. Guinot & J. Latreille & E. Mauger & M. Vincent & S. Navarro, 2006. "Measurement of the reliability of sensory panel performances," Post-Print halshs-00119591, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-00119591
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Amalia Vanacore & Maria Sole Pellegrino, 2019. "Checking quality of sensory data via an agreement-based approach," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 53(5), pages 2545-2556, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-00119591. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.