Fiscal competition between municipalities : Granger causality evidence in a dynamic panel data model
Author
Abstract
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.
Citations
Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
Cited by:
- Andrea Filippetti & Giovanni Cerulli, 2018.
"Are local public services better delivered in more autonomous regions? Evidence from European regions using a dose‐response approach,"
Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 97(3), pages 801-826, August.
- Filippetti, Andrea & Cerulli, Giovanni, 2018. "Are local public services better delivered in more autonomous regions? Evidence from European regions using a dose-response approach," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 100770, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
- José da Silva Costa & Armindo Cravalho, 2013. "Yardstick Competition among Portuguese Municipalities: The Case of Urban Property Tax (IMI)," FEP Working Papers 495, Universidade do Porto, Faculdade de Economia do Porto.
- Yu Cui & Yamin Zhang, 2024. "What urban public services do immigrant entrepreneurs with different educational backgrounds most value?," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-13, December.
- Michael Keen & Kai A. Konrad, 2012. "International Tax Competition and Coordination," Working Papers international_tax_competi, Max Planck Institute for Tax Law and Public Finance.
- Yiguo Chen & Peng Luo & Tsangyao Chang, 2020. "Urbanization and the Urban–Rural Income Gap in China: A Continuous Wavelet Coherency Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-14, October.
More about this item
Keywords
fiscal competition; municipalities; Granger causality evidence; dynamic panel data model;All these keywords.
Statistics
Access and download statisticsCorrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-00109401. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.