IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-05014603.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Immigration and labour productivity: A comparative effect

Author

Listed:
  • Blaise Gnimassoun

    (BETA - Bureau d'Économie Théorique et Appliquée - AgroParisTech - UNISTRA - Université de Strasbourg - Université de Haute-Alsace (UHA) - Université de Haute-Alsace (UHA) Mulhouse - Colmar - UL - Université de Lorraine - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique - INRAE - Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement)

Abstract

This paper examines the impact of immigration on labour productivity by distinguishing between global effects and the effects of intra-African immigration. Theoretically, intra-African immigration is expected to have relatively larger effects due to the low level of intra-African trade and the resulting differences in the prices of goods and factors. Empirically, I rely on a panel of 187 countries, including 53 African countries, over the period 1990-2019, and use a gravity-based instrumental variables approach to address endogeneity. The results show that intra-African immigration has a positive, significant, and robust impact on labour productivity in Africa. This impact is greater than the effect of immigration in the global sample and primarily occurs through improvements in total factor productivity and capital efficiency. While immigration tends to reduce capital productivity globally, intra-African immigration enhances it in Africa. Furthermore, the services sector benefits more from the positive effects of immigration.

Suggested Citation

  • Blaise Gnimassoun, 2025. "Immigration and labour productivity: A comparative effect," Post-Print hal-05014603, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05014603
    DOI: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2025.106920
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05014603. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.