IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-04975756.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Punishment Menus as a Means to Reduce Appeals by Guilty Offenders

Author

Listed:
  • Gilles Grolleau

    (ESSCA School of Management Lyon)

  • Naoufel Mzoughi

    (ECODEVELOPPEMENT - Ecodéveloppement - INRAE - Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement)

Abstract

Appeals are a time- and resource-consuming process, especially from the perspective of the justice system. We introduce punishment menus and argue that one of their advantages can be their capacity to reduce the likelihood of appeals by guilty offenders. Specifically, when offenders can select their punishment, they may experience a greater sense of psychological ownership over the decision and refrain from appealing. While designing appropriate punishment menus requires thoughtful consideration, decision-makers should explore their potential as a strategic approach to streamline the justice process and address appeal-related challenges.

Suggested Citation

  • Gilles Grolleau & Naoufel Mzoughi, 2025. "Punishment Menus as a Means to Reduce Appeals by Guilty Offenders," Post-Print hal-04975756, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04975756
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.inrae.fr/hal-04975756v1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04975756. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.