Author
Abstract
The evolution of internet and web technologies has given rise to innovation crowdsourcing platforms, which facilitate the externalization of complex problems to the crowd, leveraging the collective wisdom of individuals with heterogeneous characteristics for problem solving (Estellés-Arolas & González-Ladrón-De- Guevara, 2012). Frequently, companies engage in innovation crowdsourcing (ICS) on the assumption that problems can be decomposed, solved independently, and then combined to form valuable solutions. However, previous research has provided evidence that many innovation problems require interaction between different knowledge components (Natalicchio et al., 2017; Nickerson & Zenger, 2004). This has raised the question of the potential benefits of facilitating simultaneous competitive and collaborative behaviors between contestants. It is well-documented that collaborative efforts engender more creative and original solutions, thanks to the confrontation of different perspectives, skills and experiences (Leonard-Barton & Swap, 1999). Teams also exhibit enhanced project execution efficiency by distributing tasks and extending mutual support, thereby surmounting obstacles more effectively (Mathieu et al., 2008). Therefore, platforms increasingly incorporate communication tools that enable the development of interconnected networks through discussion forums, private chats, and solution sharing spaces. Despite the potential benefits, teamwork might not be as prevalent on these platforms due to inherent challenges, including high coordination costs linked to asynchronous communication that leads to prolonged response times (Faullant et al., 2017), as well as disparities in contributions fostering behaviors such as free riding (Lazear & Shaw, 2007). Moreover, incentives typically aim to attract participants rather than foster desirable behaviors like collaboration. To date, the impact of platform managers on team structure and resource allocation via incentive systems remains largely unexplored. To fill this knowledge gap, we examine the influence of the incentive system on the structure and resource distribution of self-organized teams competing in ICS contests. Specifically, the two research questions that motivate our research are: (1) What is the influence of monetary and non-monetary incentives on team structure and characteristics? (2) What characteristics of teams predict their performance in ICS contests?
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
To our knowledge, this item is not available for
download. To find whether it is available, there are three
options:
1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's
web page
whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a
search for a similarly titled item that would be
available.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04952350. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.