Author
Listed:
- Audrey Cosson
(Institut Lyfe Research & Innovation Center (ex-Institut Paul Bocuse Research Center) - LYFE - Institut Lyfe (ex-Institut Paul Bocuse))
- Maxime Sebbane
(UMR MoISA - Montpellier Interdisciplinary center on Sustainable Agri-food systems (Social and nutritional sciences) - Cirad - Centre de Coopération Internationale en Recherche Agronomique pour le Développement - IRD - Institut de Recherche pour le Développement - CIHEAM-IAMM - Centre International de Hautes Etudes Agronomiques Méditerranéennes - Institut Agronomique Méditerranéen de Montpellier - CIHEAM - Centre International de Hautes Études Agronomiques Méditerranéennes - INRAE - Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement - Institut Agro Montpellier - Institut Agro - Institut national d'enseignement supérieur pour l'agriculture, l'alimentation et l'environnement, Institut Lyfe Research & Innovation Center (ex-Institut Paul Bocuse Research Center) - LYFE - Institut Lyfe (ex-Institut Paul Bocuse))
- Elsa Chevillard
(Institut Lyfe Research & Innovation Center (ex-Institut Paul Bocuse Research Center) - LYFE - Institut Lyfe (ex-Institut Paul Bocuse))
- Anestis Dougkas
(Institut Lyfe Research & Innovation Center (ex-Institut Paul Bocuse Research Center) - LYFE - Institut Lyfe (ex-Institut Paul Bocuse), UCBL - Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1 - Université de Lyon)
Abstract
Adopting diets that recalibrate the balance between animal and plant proteins emerges as a sustainable solution in response to global population growth and climate change. This study investigates the impact of reducing animal protein (meat) portions in favour of plant proteins (legumes) on consumer appreciation and consumption in restaurant settings. Employing a single-blind protocol, 271 participants were engaged in an experimental restaurant. The experimental design examined the effects of meat-to-legume ratio (reference: 150 g meat, 200 g legumes; reduced: 95 g meat, 260 g legumes), legume types (chickpeas vs. white beans), and meat types (pork vs. beef). Appetite and liking were assessed using visual analogue scales, while food consumption was measured post-meal. Overall, participants consumed between 100 % and 80 % of their main course. ANOVA analysis on reference meat-to-legume ratio, legume type, and meat type effects on taste and appetite revealed minimal differences (P < 0.05). Notably, the reference meat-to-legume ratio scored lower than the reference in overall main course appreciation (7.23/10 vs. 8.31/10) and taste (7.26/10 vs. 8.40/10) (P < 0.05). This underscores the potential to enhance legume proportion on the plate while preserving satiety and overall consumption through meticulous attention to legume sensory experience and protein portion adjustments.
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
To our knowledge, this item is not available for
download. To find whether it is available, there are three
options:
1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's
web page
whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a
search for a similarly titled item that would be
available.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04926306. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.