IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-04906905.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Dominance and Collaboration in Logistics Triads: The Case Studies from New Zealand

Author

Listed:
  • Wen Luo

    (NNU - Nanjing Normal University)

  • V. G Venkatesh

    (Métis Lab EM Normandie - EM Normandie - École de Management de Normandie = EM Normandie Business School)

  • Yangyan Shi

    (Macquarie University [Sydney])

  • Tiru Arthanari

    (University of Auckland [Auckland])

Abstract

The study focuses on understanding how different supply chain stakeholders' power dynamics influence supply chain relationships' stability and dynamics in a logistics triad. The study uses a qualitative research approach (multiple case studies) to collect data from the perspectives of logistics service providers (LSPs), suppliers, and customers. Having unique resource/service capability helps the LSP dominate long-term triad relationships by controlling its partners and impeding changes in embedded dyads. The identified theoretical and empirical outcomes provide insights to academics and practitioners to understand the supply chain relationship dynamics based on LSP's dominant power. This study's originality primarily focuses on the dominant player−-LSP−-to influence triadic supply chain relationships, which is significantly different from the traditional view−-the dominant power controlled by suppliers or customers.

Suggested Citation

  • Wen Luo & V. G Venkatesh & Yangyan Shi & Tiru Arthanari, 2023. "Dominance and Collaboration in Logistics Triads: The Case Studies from New Zealand," Post-Print hal-04906905, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04906905
    DOI: 10.1080/09537287.2021.1967498
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04906905. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.