IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-04875467.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Extreme severity modeling using a GLM-GPD combination: application to an excess of loss reinsurance treaty

Author

Listed:
  • Sarra Ghaddab

    (UCBL - Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1 - Université de Lyon, LSAF - Laboratoire de Sciences Actuarielle et Financière - UCBL - Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1 - Université de Lyon, Université de Sousse, LAREMFIQ - Laboratory Research for Economy, Management and Quantitative Finance - Institut des Hautes Etudes Commerciales (Université de Sousse))

  • Manel Kacem

    (Université de Sousse, LAREMFIQ - Laboratory Research for Economy, Management and Quantitative Finance - Institut des Hautes Etudes Commerciales (Université de Sousse))

  • Christian de Peretti

    (ECL - École Centrale de Lyon - Université de Lyon, LSAF - Laboratoire de Sciences Actuarielle et Financière - UCBL - Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1 - Université de Lyon)

  • Lotfi Belkacem

    (Université de Sousse, LAREMFIQ - Laboratory Research for Economy, Management and Quantitative Finance - Institut des Hautes Etudes Commerciales (Université de Sousse))

Abstract

This article studies the model proposed by Laudagé et al. (Insur Math Econ 88:77–92, 2019) and examines whether the combination between a Generalized Linear Model (GLM) and a Generalized Pareto Distribution (GPD) is valid for modeling claims severity in a practical framework. For this, we consider a real fire insurance dataset and fit the proposed model to these data. In this modeling, the threshold is of great importance since it separates the data into two parts and represents the point from which the observations become extremes. Therefore, in order to guarantee the correct choice of this threshold, one extra method is adopted in addition to that used by Laudagé et al. (2019). Furthermore, we build on the authors' results and extend them by fitting the attritional data to three well-known distributions. The results of this study show that the GLM-GPD combination outperforms the benchmark model (classical GLM) in terms of predictive power. In addition, the application of an excess of loss reinsurance treaty to these two models proves that it is more interesting for an insurer to adopt a GLM-GPD combination so as not to underestimate the risk and go bankrupt. This justifies that the combined modeling is reasonably good to describe insurance claim costs.

Suggested Citation

  • Sarra Ghaddab & Manel Kacem & Christian de Peretti & Lotfi Belkacem, 2023. "Extreme severity modeling using a GLM-GPD combination: application to an excess of loss reinsurance treaty," Post-Print hal-04875467, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04875467
    DOI: 10.1007/s00181-023-02371-4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04875467. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.