IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-04838650.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Performance measurement systems and CSR: Comparison of models for sustainable management
[Systèmes de mesure de la performance et RSE : Comparaison des modèles pour une gestion durable Performance measurement systems and CSR: Comparison of models for sustainable management]

Author

Listed:
  • Wafa El Fkihi

    ((LARCEPEM) - Laboratoire de Recherche en Compétitivité Economique et Performance Managériale (LARCEPEM)Centre Interdisciplinaire de Recherche en performance et Compétitivité Faculté des Sciences Juridiques Economiques et Sociales – Souissi Université Mohammed V- Rabat. Maroc)

  • Badr Touzi

    ((LARCEPEM) - Laboratoire de Recherche en Compétitivité Economique et Performance Managériale (LARCEPEM) Centre Interdisciplinaire de Recherche en performance et Compétitivité Faculté des Sciences Juridiques Economiques et Socia)

  • Fadwa Farchi

    (Laboratoire d’Ingénierie Mécanique, Management Industriel et Innovation Faculté des Sciences et Techniques Université Hassan 1er de Settat, Maroc)

Abstract

In a world where environmental and social issues are gaining prominence, it is crucial for entities to reassess their managerial strategies in pursuit of organizational performance; the paradigm of sustainable development thus emerges as an essential framework for integrating new practices to ensure the sustainability of organizations. In this context, the notion of performance becomes vague, polysemous, and difficult to grasp. Today, it is no longer limited to financial concerns; it now includes other economic, social, and environmental issues. Therefore, it is necessary for organizations to review their performance measurement systems. The issue of performance measurement has become an essential management tool for organizations opting for sustainable development strategies. Thus, the main objective of this article is to analyze and compare different performance measurement models, including the Balanced Scorecard, Key Performance Indicators (KPI), Management by Objectives (MBO), and Six Sigma, in order to assess their relevance and effectiveness within the framework of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) and sustainable management. Methodologically, this traditional literature review aims to identify the strengths and weaknesses of each model through a comparative analysis of four key aspects of performance measurement systems: effectiveness, ease of implementation, scope, and impact on organizational culture. The data is based on qualitative and quantitative assessments, with ratings ranging from 1 to 5. The results provide a comprehensive view of the suitability of each system to specific organizational needs and pave the way for new research perspectives on theoretical and practical approaches in the field of organizational management aimed at establishing systems for measuring sustainable organizational performance.

Suggested Citation

  • Wafa El Fkihi & Badr Touzi & Fadwa Farchi, 2024. "Performance measurement systems and CSR: Comparison of models for sustainable management [Systèmes de mesure de la performance et RSE : Comparaison des modèles pour une gestion durable Performance ," Post-Print hal-04838650, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04838650
    DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.14253405
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-04838650v1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hal.science/hal-04838650v1/document
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.5281/zenodo.14253405?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04838650. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.