IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-04791105.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Estimating the prevalence of child labour in the cocoa industry via indirect elicitation methods: a mixed-methods study

Author

Listed:
  • Aurelia Lepine

    (UCL - University College of London [London])

  • Ariane Ndiore

    (UFHB - Université Félix Houphouët-Boigny [Abidjan, Côte d'Ivoire])

  • Carole Treibich

    (GAEL - Laboratoire d'Economie Appliquée de Grenoble - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique - INRAE - Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement - UGA - Université Grenoble Alpes - Grenoble INP - Institut polytechnique de Grenoble - Grenoble Institute of Technology - UGA - Université Grenoble Alpes)

  • Henry Cust

    (UCL - University College of London [London])

  • Laurent Foubert

    (International Cocoa Initiative, Geneva,)

  • Megan Passey

    (International Cocoa Initiative, Geneva,)

  • Selina Binder

    (Barry Callebaut, Zurich)

Abstract

Data from children suggest that the prevalence of child labour in the cocoa industry in Côte d'Ivoire is a worrying 38%. However, while surveying children has the potential to reduce sensitivity biases such as social desirability bias, it presents significant ethical dilemmas and may also be associated with other reporting biases, making accurate estimates of child labour difficult. To address this, we collected data from 1741 cocoa producers to assess whether parents could provide more accurate estimates using indirect survey methods. We compared direct questioning with a list experiment and a novel non-verbal method (‘colorbox'). We found higher prevalence rates of child labour using indirect elicitation methods, but lower than those obtained from children's surveys. Qualitative in-depth interviews revealed motivations for underreporting, including fear of legal consequences and mistrust of stakeholders. Indirect methods alone are not sufficient to correct for underreporting when child labour is collected from parents. Future research should prioritise direct data collection from children and address ethical concerns to obtain more accurate estimates of child labour.

Suggested Citation

  • Aurelia Lepine & Ariane Ndiore & Carole Treibich & Henry Cust & Laurent Foubert & Megan Passey & Selina Binder, 2024. "Estimating the prevalence of child labour in the cocoa industry via indirect elicitation methods: a mixed-methods study," Post-Print hal-04791105, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04791105
    DOI: 10.1007/s00148-024-01054-3
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-04791105v1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hal.science/hal-04791105v1/document
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s00148-024-01054-3?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04791105. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.