IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-04760061.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Analysis of the influence of implicit factors on the HTA deliberative process: results from a survey in 5 European countries

Author

Listed:
  • C Monleón

    (P2S - Parcours santé systémique - UCBL - Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1 - Université de Lyon)

  • H M Späth

    (P2S - Parcours santé systémique - UCBL - Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1 - Université de Lyon)

  • C Crespo

    (UNIVERSITE DE BARCELONA ESP - Partenaires IRSTEA - IRSTEA - Institut national de recherche en sciences et technologies pour l'environnement et l'agriculture)

  • C Dussart

    (P2S - Parcours santé systémique - UCBL - Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1 - Université de Lyon)

  • M Toumi

    (AMU - Aix Marseille Université)

Abstract

Objectives Implicit factors can be defined as any criteria playing a role in the HTA deliberative process but that are not being part of the HTA framework. To date, only very few studies have explored the influence of implicit factors on this process. This survey of HTA experts in 5 European countries aimed to analyze the influence of implicit factors on the HTA deliberative process. Methods Semi-structured interviews with HTA experts (n = 20) from 5 European countries (Spain, France, Italy, Germany and United Kingdom) were conducted in February-May 2021. The main topics of the interviews were (1) the HTA deliberative process, (2) the degree of influence ion HTA deliberative process of a set of factors that were previously identified in a systematic literature review performed by the authors and (3) recommendations to improve the deliberative process. Results 18/20 HTA experts concurred that implicit factors play a role in the process. Only 2 German experts considered that they have a low influence on HTA deliberative process. The implicit factors scored with the highest influence in the process were (1) burden of disease, (2) unmet need and (3) professional experience of the members participating in the HTA deliberative process. To improve the deliberative process, 12 experts suggested to increase the external stakeholder perspective in the process (i.e. patients, pharmaceutical industry, general public), 6 stressed the importance of revealing implicit factors and 5 recommended to develop a methodology to quantify the influence of these factors. Conclusions Our survey indicates a need for increasing external involvement in HTA deliberative process and for developing a methodology to unmask implicit factors that influence this process. This may be achieved by either updating the current deliberative process frameworks to include these factors or by developing new methods that address them.

Suggested Citation

  • C Monleón & H M Späth & C Crespo & C Dussart & M Toumi, 2021. "Analysis of the influence of implicit factors on the HTA deliberative process: results from a survey in 5 European countries," Post-Print hal-04760061, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04760061
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-04760061v1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hal.science/hal-04760061v1/document
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04760061. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.