IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-04750353.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Optimising the public health benefits of sex work regulation in Senegal: Results from qualitative interviews with policy stakeholders

Author

Listed:
  • Aurélia Lépine

    (UCL - University College of London [London])

  • Fanny Procureur

    (UCL - University College of London [London])

  • Sandie Szawlowski

    (UCL - University College of London [London])

  • Carole Treibich

    (GAEL - Laboratoire d'Economie Appliquée de Grenoble - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique - INRAE - Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement - UGA - Université Grenoble Alpes - Grenoble INP - Institut polytechnique de Grenoble - Grenoble Institute of Technology - UGA - Université Grenoble Alpes)

  • El Hadj Mbaye

    (Ministry of Health and Social Action, Dakar)

  • Khady Gueye

    (Ministry of Health and Social Action, Dakar)

  • Cheikh Tidiane Ndour

    (Ministry of Health and Social Action, Dakar)

Abstract

Context: There is compelling evidence that eliminating sexually transmitted infections (STIs) among female sex workers (FSWs) is a cost-effective approach to reducing the spread of HIV/ AIDS. Although many countries recognise sex work as a public health issue, few have implemented public health policies specifically aimed at controlling the transmission of HIV/ AIDS among FSWs. In particular, Senegal stands out as the only African country to regulate sex work through a specific public health policy that requires FSWs to register with a health centre. Despite the potential health and legal benefits associated with registration, a staggering 80% of FSWs in Senegal remain unregistered. This low registration rate hinders the realisation of the policy's full potential for public health benefits. The reluctance of FSWs to register is due to inherent flaws in the policy design, where the disadvantages of registration outweigh the benefits for FSWs. Objective: To identify which modifications to the current registration policy have the potential to increase uptake of registration by FSWs and to assess their feasibility in the context of Senegal. Method: We conducted a qualitative policy research study using semi-structured in-depth interviews with 22 national stakeholders in this policy, including representatives from the police, government and non-governmental organisations (NGOs) in Dakar, Senegal, as well as FSWs' leaders. The interview data were thematically coded using the interview topic guide and other recurring themes and analysed using thematic analysis on Nvivo 12. Results: A total of 20 relevant themes were selected, focusing primarily on assessing the feasibility of potential interventions and identifying potential barriers and associated risks. We found that, without changing current legislation, improving relationships between FSWs and police officers, providing accurate and accessible information about the rules and benefits of the policy, and offering psychosocial support have the potential to improve both the registration rate of FSWs and their wellbeing. Policy features designed to increase registration by improving FSWs' confidentiality, and thus their confidence in the services offered, were also discussed. Conclusions: The study highlighted that several national public health policies could be changed to increase the registration rate of FSWs and improve their wellbeing without overturning constitutional law.

Suggested Citation

  • Aurélia Lépine & Fanny Procureur & Sandie Szawlowski & Carole Treibich & El Hadj Mbaye & Khady Gueye & Cheikh Tidiane Ndour, 2024. "Optimising the public health benefits of sex work regulation in Senegal: Results from qualitative interviews with policy stakeholders," Post-Print hal-04750353, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04750353
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0306803
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-04750353v1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hal.science/hal-04750353v1/document
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0306803?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04750353. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.