IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-04740675.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Why did you delete my comment? Investigating observing consumers' reactions to comment-deletion-clues during a brand crisis

Author

Listed:
  • J. Junyun Liao
  • Y. Yaohua Ye
  • R. Filieri

    (Audencia Business School)

  • P. Peng Du
  • Y. Ying Jiang

Abstract

Many users criticize brands by posting negative comments on their social media pages when a brand crisis occurs. Brands often choose to delete negative comments when coping with brand crises. While deleting comments often goes unnoticed, complaints about comment deletion from users whose comments are deleted (e.g., "Why did you delete my comment?") serve as clues for observers after a crisis. Drawing from Warranting Theory, this study examines comment-deletion-clues' impact on observers' forgiveness and negative word-of-mouth (NWOM) transmission and how two types of brand explanations (custom vs. general) alter this impact. Four studies show that the comment-deletion-clues reduce observers' intention to forgive the brand and increase the spread of NWOM. Furthermore, the results indicate that brands' custom explanations mitigate the adverse effects of comment-deletion-clues. This article is among the first to explore the role of content moderation during brand crises and extends the brand crisis literature and the emerging content moderation literature.

Suggested Citation

  • J. Junyun Liao & Y. Yaohua Ye & R. Filieri & P. Peng Du & Y. Ying Jiang, 2024. "Why did you delete my comment? Investigating observing consumers' reactions to comment-deletion-clues during a brand crisis," Post-Print hal-04740675, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04740675
    DOI: 10.1002/mar.22065
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-04740675v1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04740675. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.