IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-04726112.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

How to evaluate complex interventions to prevent MSDs and PHI?
[Comment évaluer les interventions complexes de prévention des TMS et des RPS ?]

Author

Listed:
  • Dominique Chouanière

    (INRS ( Vandoeuvre lès Nancy) - Institut national de recherche et de sécurité (Vandoeuvre lès Nancy))

  • Aude Cuny-Guerrier

    (INRS ( Vandoeuvre lès Nancy) - Institut national de recherche et de sécurité (Vandoeuvre lès Nancy))

  • Charles Parmentier

    (ANACT - Agence Nationale d'Amélioration des Conditions de Travail - Anact, Lyon)

  • Philippe Douillet

    (ANACT - Agence Nationale d'Amélioration des Conditions de Travail - Anact, Lyon)

  • Anne-Marie Gallet

    (ANACT - Agence Nationale d'Amélioration des Conditions de Travail - Anact, Lyon)

Abstract

Evaluating prevention interventions is often perceived as a challenge to professional knowledge. What's more, evaluating interventions, especially in the prevention of musculoskeletal disorders or psychosocial risks, can represent an out-of-reach challenge. However, evaluation can have a learning perspective and a formative virtue, and thanks to the new Evalia tool developed by INRS and Anact, it is made easier: for those who have tried it out, the benefits are convincing.

Suggested Citation

  • Dominique Chouanière & Aude Cuny-Guerrier & Charles Parmentier & Philippe Douillet & Anne-Marie Gallet, 2019. "How to evaluate complex interventions to prevent MSDs and PHI? [Comment évaluer les interventions complexes de prévention des TMS et des RPS ?]," Post-Print hal-04726112, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04726112
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-04726112v1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hal.science/hal-04726112v1/document
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04726112. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.