IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-04692259.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The impact of loneliness on economic trust: experimental evidence from 27 European countries

Author

Listed:
  • Astrid Hopfensitz

    (GATE - Groupe d'analyse et de théorie économique - UL2 - Université Lumière - Lyon 2 - ENS LSH - Ecole Normale Supérieure Lettres et Sciences Humaines - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, EM - EMLyon Business School)

  • Elena Stepanova
  • Marius Alt

Abstract

Trust behavior and being trusted are influenced by a multitude of individual and situational factors. In this paper, we focus on a novel dimension, hypothesized to be related to trust behavior, that has so far received little attention in economics: loneliness. Through a large, incentivized trust experiment conducted in 27 European countries with more than 27000 respondents, we investigate: (i) the relationship between self-reported loneliness and trust and trustworthiness behavior and (ii) the impact of loneliness on receiving trust from others. In line with previous research from psychology, we observe a strong negative correlation between self-reported general trust and loneliness. This relationship is however not replicated in an incentivized trust setting: lonely individuals are even more trusting than individuals who are not lonely. Lonely individuals seem no different from non-lonely individuals regarding their trustworthiness. We finally observe that lonely individuals are treated significantly differently in the trust game: they receive significantly more trust from others and benefit from more trustworthy behavior. Overall, our results suggest that lonely individuals are willing to trust more than non-lonely individuals when real monetary stakes are at hand. This increased willingness to take social risk is however not reflected in their own self-reports regarding trust.

Suggested Citation

  • Astrid Hopfensitz & Elena Stepanova & Marius Alt, 2024. "The impact of loneliness on economic trust: experimental evidence from 27 European countries," Post-Print hal-04692259, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04692259
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04692259. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.