IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-04688983.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Exploration of the situated acceptability of a territorial health pathway

Author

Listed:
  • cassandra delorme

    (CleRMa - Clermont Recherche Management - ESC Clermont-Ferrand - École Supérieure de Commerce (ESC) - Clermont-Ferrand - UCA - Université Clermont Auvergne, IAE - UCA - Institut d'Administration des Entreprises - Clermont-Auvergne - UCA - Université Clermont Auvergne, S&T - chaire Santé et Territoires)

Abstract

In the face of an aging population and the prevalence of chronic diseases, the World Health Organization (WHO 2022b) promotes the development of patient-centered, multi-professional, and multi-organizational care approaches, such as health pathways. While this integrative approach is being promoted in France, its deployment represents a major challenge, marking a break with the compartmentalised city/hospital approach. In aging rural areas like the Haut Cantal, which is landlocked and sparsely populated, the stakes are crucial to ensure access to quality healthcare. Our study delves into the local deployment of a territorial health pathway in this region, shedding light on the obstacles and levers to its successful acceptability. We employ the situated acceptance model (Bobillier Chaumon 2016; Lai et al. 2020), a comprehensive framework for analysing the acceptability of a management dispositive by examining users' relationships with the dispositive (personal dimension), with the work organization (organizational dimension), with other users (interpersonal dimension), and with their job (professional dimension). This model is particularly well-suited for our research, as it allows us to capture the multifaceted nature of the implementation process. The analysis of the qualitative data collected was conducted using a thematic approach, combining both a priori and a posteriori coding. This methodology was chosen to deepen our understanding of the modalities of acceptability in a specific rural context, taking into account the nuances and particularities unique to each interviewed actor. Our results show that the level of knowledge of this system varies significantly among professionals, leading to a fragmented acceptability of the health pathway. Several barriers to acceptability were identified, including cognitive overload, perceived loss of autonomy, and the reconfiguration of work collectives. Nevertheless, actions such as training and clear communication are promising avenues for improvement. This research contributes to knowledge on fostering successful public collaborations (Cristofoli, Meneguzzo, and Riccucci 2017) and expands the application of the situated acceptance model to a new context. Our findings proved valuable insights for effectively implementing territorial health pathways and promoting their acceptability by stakeholders, ultimately contributing to improving healthcare delivery in rural areas.

Suggested Citation

  • cassandra delorme, 2024. "Exploration of the situated acceptability of a territorial health pathway," Post-Print hal-04688983, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04688983
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04688983. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.