IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-04680682.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

All Words Have Consequences: Concrete versus Abstract Language in Management Response to Hotel Guest Reviews

Author

Listed:
  • C. Li
  • Y. Yu
  • R. Filieri

    (Audencia Business School)

  • G. Cui

Abstract

Hospitality managers increasingly respond to hotel guest reviews to achieve customer satisfaction and cultivate customer relationships. Conventional wisdom suggests that concrete language is more effective in customer service encounters. However, little is known whether, when and why abstract versus concrete management response is more effective in achieving customer satisfaction. We adopt a mixed-method approach with a big data study based on a sample of 1,253,668 reviews from 2306 hotels and two scenario-based laboratory experiments. We show that abstract (versus concrete) management response fosters greater customer satisfaction when it addresses positive (versus negative) reviews or is from a senior manager (versus junior staff). When responding to positive (versus negative) reviews or issued by a senior manager (versus junior staff), the abstract (versus concrete) response enhances customers' perceived warmth (versus perceived competence). Our findings provide meaningful guidelines for the hospitality and tourism industry.

Suggested Citation

  • C. Li & Y. Yu & R. Filieri & G. Cui, 2025. "All Words Have Consequences: Concrete versus Abstract Language in Management Response to Hotel Guest Reviews," Post-Print hal-04680682, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04680682
    DOI: 10.1016/j.tourman.2024.105032
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-04680682
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04680682. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.