IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-04648043.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Quels modèles d’évaluation du travail ?

Author

Listed:
  • Benjamin Dubrion

    (LEFI - Laboratoire d'Economie de la Firme et des Institutions - UL2 - Université Lumière - Lyon 2)

  • Bernard Baudry

    (LEFI - Laboratoire d'Economie de la Firme et des Institutions - UL2 - Université Lumière - Lyon 2)

Abstract

"L'évaluation du travail dans les grandes entreprises françaises depuis quarante ans donnent lieu à un large débat. La logique de ces pratiques d'évaluation est analysée à la lumière d'une grille économique enrichie d'apports récents en gestion et en sociologie du travail. Après avoir analysé deux modèles idéaux-types d'évaluation - le modèle d'évaluation impersonnelle et le modèle d'évaluation personnelle - l'article montre que le modèle d'évaluation personnelle en émergence aujourd'hui est porteur de certaines tensions : au niveau de la recherche d'objectivité dans la description du travail, au niveau des limites de la procédure d'appréciation individuelle, et au niveau des contradictions entre la dimension individuelle mise en avant par les pratiques d'évaluation et la dimension collective nécessaire au bon fonctionnement de l'entreprise."

Suggested Citation

  • Benjamin Dubrion & Bernard Baudry, 2005. "Quels modèles d’évaluation du travail ?," Post-Print hal-04648043, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04648043
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04648043. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.