IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-04633295.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Industry 4.0 ten years on: A bibliometric and systematic review of concepts, sustainability value drivers, and success determinants

Author

Listed:
  • Morteza Ghobakhloo

    (KTU - Kaunas University of Technology)

  • Masood Fathi

    (Department Engineering Sciences - Industrial Engineering and Management [Uppsala] - Uppsala University, University of Skövde [Sweden])

  • Mohammad Iranmanesh

    (ECU - Edith Cowan University)

  • Parisa Maroufkhani
  • Manuel E Morales

    (KTU - Kaunas University of Technology)

Abstract

The fourth industrial revolution, known as Industry 4.0, and the underlying digital transformation, is a cuttingedge research topic across various disciplines. Industry 4.0 literature is growing exponentially, overexpanding the current understanding of the digital industrial revolution through thousands of academic publications. This unprecedented growth calls for a systematic review of the concept, scope, definition, and functionality of Industry 4.0 to address the existing ambiguities and deliver a clear, comprehensive, and up-to-date overview of this phenomenon. Consistently, the present study carried out a systematic literature review of related articles, published online within the Industry 4.0 discipline until November 2020. The systematic literature review identified 745 eligible articles and applied extensive qualitative and quantitative data analysis to methodically answer the four research questions proposed. The study provides a descriptive assessment of eligible articles' properties and offers a unified conceptualization of Industry 4.0 and the underlying building blocks. The study further describes the value drivers of the fourth industrial revolution and identifies the conditions on which digital industrial transformation's success lays. The study also draws on the findings and offers important theoretical and practical implications, highlights the existing gaps within the literature, and discusses the possible future research directions. 1.IntroductionIndustry 4.0 is becoming popular exponentially among industrial, political, scientific, and academic communities (Beier et al., 2020; Rosa et al., 2020). Industry 4.0 involves the promise of a new industrial revolution, commonly labeled as the fourth industrial revolution (Mahmood and Mubarik, 2020; Wang et al., 2020). The first reference to Industry 4.0 occurred in 2011, yet, it is misleading to assume that Industry 4.0 is a sudden revolution utterly unaware of the industrial and technological revolutions that arose earlier (Liao et al., 2017; Oesterreich and Teuteberg, 2016). The first industrial revolution occurred by the end of the 18 th century, which centered around introducing machines into production. The second industrial revolution dates back to the early 19 th century, which involved the electrification of factories and the introduction of production lines. The third industrial revolution, also known as the digital revolution, is characterized by the introduction of digital technologies in production during the 1960s and 1970s. In reality, Industry 4.0 builds entirely upon the foundations of previous industrial revolutions (Culot et al., 2020). However, Industry 4.0 is expected to deliver the highest degree of digitalization, automation, virtualization, and decentralization across all industries, when coming to its maturity (Bordeleau et al., 2020; Theorin et al., 2017). The disruptive force of Industry 4.0 is argued to be massive, impacting the rules of competition, value delivery functions, labor market, socioenvironmental norms, and even educational priorities (Matthyssens, 2019; Sony and Naik, 2020). It is why international associations, governments, industrial communities, and academia have valued and prioritized the understanding of Industry 4.0 functions, capabilities, driving force, socioeconomic impacts, and future trends.The amount of hype surrounding Industry 4.0 has led to the overwhelming growth of academic publications during the past few years, from a handful of articles in 2014 and 2015 to the thousands of academic contributions in 2020. The sheer academic contributions have significantly advanced the current understanding of Industry 4.0 along with all its capabilities. The richness of Industry 4.0 literature has called for review studies to identify, synthesize, and categorize the existing scholarly literature on Industry 4.0 phenomenon and make the existing findings and evidence more comprehensible and accessible to industrialists, academicians, and decision-makers. The existing Systematic Literature Review (SLR) studies have strived to provide an overview of contributions done to various aspects of the Industry 4.0 phenomenon and address research gaps left unintended, enabling the scientific community to develop and propose more relevant and rigorous research agendas. Table A1 provides a concise review of the selected SLR articles published in the field of Industry 4.0. Previous SLR articles have addressed a wide variety of issues within the Industry 4.0 context, from broadly reviewing the Industry 4.0 phenomenon (e.g.,

Suggested Citation

  • Morteza Ghobakhloo & Masood Fathi & Mohammad Iranmanesh & Parisa Maroufkhani & Manuel E Morales, 2021. "Industry 4.0 ten years on: A bibliometric and systematic review of concepts, sustainability value drivers, and success determinants," Post-Print hal-04633295, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04633295
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127052
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://uca.hal.science/hal-04633295v1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://uca.hal.science/hal-04633295v1/document
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127052?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wang, Lu & Luo, Gong-li & Sari, Arif & Shao, Xue-Feng, 2020. "What nurtures fourth industrial revolution? An investigation of economic and social determinants of technological innovation in advanced economies," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Emon Kalyan Chowdhury & Rupam Chowdhury, 2024. "Role of Financial Inclusion in Human Development: Evidence from Bangladesh, India and Pakistan," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 15(1), pages 3329-3354, March.
    2. Hadjielias, Elias & Christofi, Michael & Christou, Prokopis & Hadjielia Drotarova, Maria, 2022. "Digitalization, agility, and customer value in tourism," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).
    3. Chiarello, Filippo & Fantoni, Gualtiero & Hogarth, Terence & Giordano, Vito & Baltina, Liga & Spada, Irene, 2021. "Towards ESCO 4.0 – Is the European classification of skills in line with Industry 4.0? A text mining approach," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    4. Danta, Subal & Rath, Badri Narayan, 2024. "Do institutional quality and human capital matter for innovation in case of Asian region?," Innovation and Green Development, Elsevier, vol. 3(3).
    5. Bhimani, Alnoor & Hausken, Kjell & Arif, Sameen, 2022. "Do national development factors affect cryptocurrency adoption?," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 181(C).
    6. Cannavacciuolo, Lorella & Ferraro, Giovanna & Ponsiglione, Cristina & Primario, Simonetta & Quinto, Ivana, 2023. "Technological innovation-enabling industry 4.0 paradigm: A systematic literature review," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 124(C).
    7. Srivastava, Richa & Singh, Deepak Kumar & Rana, Nripendra P., 2024. "Analysis of barriers to investment and mining in cryptocurrency for traditional and tech-savvy investors: A fuzzy approach," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    8. Camilla Bruna Dias Souza & Henrique Rego Monteiro Hora & Edson Terra Azevedo Filho, 2023. "Socioeconomic indicators and innovative countries associated with data mining evidence," SN Business & Economics, Springer, vol. 3(2), pages 1-24, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04633295. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.