IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-04579199.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Proposal of a Scale Measuring the Development of an Interprofessional Community of Practice in Health (CIPS)
[Proposition d’une échelle mesurant la construction d’une communauté interprofessionnelle de pratique en santé (CIPS)]

Author

Listed:
  • Jonathan Faës

    (UCL - Université catholique de Lille, UPHF - Université Polytechnique Hauts-de-France, ETHICS EA 7446 - Experience ; Technology & Human Interactions ; Care & Society : - ICL - Institut Catholique de Lille - UCL - Université catholique de Lille, CEM - Centre d’Ethique Médicale - ETHICS EA 7446 - Experience ; Technology & Human Interactions ; Care & Society : - ICL - Institut Catholique de Lille - UCL - Université catholique de Lille, UCL FMMS - Université catholique de Lille - Faculté de médecine, de maïeutique et sciences de la santé - ICL - Institut Catholique de Lille - UCL - Université catholique de Lille)

  • Grégory Aiguier

    (CEM - Centre d’Ethique Médicale - ETHICS EA 7446 - Experience ; Technology & Human Interactions ; Care & Society : - ICL - Institut Catholique de Lille - UCL - Université catholique de Lille)

Abstract

Goals Interprofessional collaboration in health is supported by various authorities, including the WHO, which attributes to it issues of safety, quality of care and holistic care. Our current research work assigns to the IPC a motivational lever allowing us to understand certain health challenges (pandemic context, etc.). We postulate that the development of a CIP must be contextualized and objectified, in order to identify the levers of action and the dimensions which structure it, with a view to proposing adapted systems or interventions, and to measure their effectiveness. . In order to meet this need, we propose a scale measuring the construction of a CIP perceived by the actors. Construction method From a theoretical and empirical anchor, we generated several constructs measuring five dimensions that support the IPC: objectives, norms, social bond, motivation, and power to act. These constructs were subjected to critical reading by experts in the field. Then, we tested this scale with caregivers in order to refine it (n=1200). Finally, we tested the scale pre- and post-test during a training day dedicated to interprofessionality and palliative care. We were able to measure the effectiveness of this scale but also its stability (n=250). Results The scale has significant internal consistency. Its use in a training context makes it possible to measure the evolution of the dimensions explored. This allows us to evaluate the effect of an interprofessional training system, in the context of palliative care. Conclusion At this stage, this scale is usable and allows interprofessional work to be appreciated. It must be supplemented by a qualitative approach which better reflects the reality of the participants. Bibliography Etienne, W. (2005). La théorie des communautés de pratique. PU LAVAL. Aiguier, G. (2020). Travailler en équipe dans une perspective de collaboration interprofessionnelle. Dans Manuel de soins palliatifs (5ème édition), dir. R. LeBerre. Dunod

Suggested Citation

  • Jonathan Faës & Grégory Aiguier, 2022. "Proposal of a Scale Measuring the Development of an Interprofessional Community of Practice in Health (CIPS) [Proposition d’une échelle mesurant la construction d’une communauté interprofessionnell," Post-Print hal-04579199, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04579199
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://univ-catholille.hal.science/hal-04579199
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04579199. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.