Author
Listed:
- Jonathan Faës
(UCL - Université catholique de Lille, UPHF - Université Polytechnique Hauts-de-France, ETHICS EA 7446 - Experience ; Technology & Human Interactions ; Care & Society : - ICL - Institut Catholique de Lille - UCL - Université catholique de Lille, CEM - Centre d’Ethique Médicale - ETHICS EA 7446 - Experience ; Technology & Human Interactions ; Care & Society : - ICL - Institut Catholique de Lille - UCL - Université catholique de Lille, UCL FMMS - Université catholique de Lille - Faculté de médecine, de maïeutique et sciences de la santé - ICL - Institut Catholique de Lille - UCL - Université catholique de Lille)
- Grégory Aiguier
(CEM - Centre d’Ethique Médicale - ETHICS EA 7446 - Experience ; Technology & Human Interactions ; Care & Society : - ICL - Institut Catholique de Lille - UCL - Université catholique de Lille)
Abstract
Context: Palliative care practices are complex and require the coordination of skills from caregivers from different professions (1). This is why interprofessional collaboration is widely encouraged, starting from initial studies (2). In France, an interministerial instruction issued in May 2017 calls for the creation of an interdisciplinary teaching program in palliative care for certain health students (Medical students, physiotherapy students, nursing students). The evaluation carried out through the IGAS report (3) highlights logistical difficulties in deploying this type of teaching. Within our university, we translated this directive into a one-day interprofessional training program conducted in small groups. Pedagogically, we chose to focus the program on the professionalization of students, measuring in particular the development of an interprofessional health practice community and its persistence beyond the training period. Method: To do this, we constructed a scale that measures the interprofessional health practice community (CIPS), composed of five dimensions: objectives, norms, social links, motivation, and empowerment. This scale (CIPS) was submitted to the students participating in this day, at three different times : at t0 before the program, at t1 immediately after it, and at t2, one month later. The paired t-test was used on matched samples; n = 277 respondents and 266 usable questionnaires. Results: The results show that in the post-test, the five dimensions are strengthened, followed by a significant decrease in the month that follows, eventually losing all significance after 1 month. Conclusion: In light of these results, the conditions and methods of interprofessional training in the context of palliative care need to be reexamined. It is, in our view, not only about questioning how initial health training effectively contributes to the construction of students' interprofessional identity, but also about developing their belonging to an inclusive community of care that integrates the patient, their relatives, and more broadly, the societal and cultural aspects related to end-of-life care. This calls for a more contextualized pedagogy that would make it more meaningful. References: 1. Aiguier G. Chapitre 42. Travailler en équipe dans une perspective de collaboration interprofessionnelle. Dans : Rozenn Le Berre éd., Manuel de soins palliatifs Paris : Dunod, 2020:910-8. 2. OMS/HRH/HPN/10.3. 3. RAPPORT IGAS N° 2018-140R.
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
To our knowledge, this item is not available for
download. To find whether it is available, there are three
options:
1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's
web page
whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a
search for a similarly titled item that would be
available.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04578430. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.