IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-04577638.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Évaluation d’un dispositif de formation à l’interprofessionnalité chez les étudiants en santé

Author

Listed:
  • Jonathan Faes

    (UCL - Université catholique de Lille, UPHF - Université Polytechnique Hauts-de-France, ETHICS EA 7446 - Experience ; Technology & Human Interactions ; Care & Society : - ICL - Institut Catholique de Lille - UCL - Université catholique de Lille, CEM - Centre d’Ethique Médicale - ETHICS EA 7446 - Experience ; Technology & Human Interactions ; Care & Society : - ICL - Institut Catholique de Lille - UCL - Université catholique de Lille, UCL FMMS - Université catholique de Lille - Faculté de médecine, de maïeutique et sciences de la santé - ICL - Institut Catholique de Lille - UCL - Université catholique de Lille)

  • Grégory Aiguier

    (CEM - Centre d’Ethique Médicale - ETHICS EA 7446 - Experience ; Technology & Human Interactions ; Care & Society : - ICL - Institut Catholique de Lille - UCL - Université catholique de Lille)

Abstract

Context Palliative care practices are complex and require coordination of skills from caregivers from different professions (1). Interprofessional collaboration is widely encouraged, starting from the initial training (2). In France, an interministerial directive issued in May 2017 called for the creation of interdisciplinary education for health students. Within the university, we set up a one-day training on interprofessionalism in the context of palliative care, involving nursing students, medical students, and physiotherapy students. An evaluation through the IGAS report (3) highlights logistical difficulties in deploying this type of education. This study attempts to understand how such a program contributes to the professionalization of students, particularly by measuring the persistence of learning. Method A scale measuring the construction of an interprofessional community of practice in health (CIPS) (4) was administered three times at three different points to students participating in this day: at T0 before the program, at T1 immediately after, and at T2, one month later. This scale measures five dimensions: objectives, norms, social bonds, motivation, and agency. The Student's t-test was used on paired samples. n=277 respondents and 266 usable questionnaires. Results show that in the post-test, all five dimensions are strengthened, then a significant decrease begins in the following month, ultimately losing all significance at one month. Conclusion In light of these results, the conditions of this type of training program on interprofessionalism in a palliative care context need to be reconsidered. It is crucial to question how initial health education contributes to the building of interprofessional identity in the context of palliative care and end-of-life care. References (1) Aiguier, G. (2020). Chapitre 42. Travailler en équipe dans une perspective de collaboration interprofessionnelle. Dans : Rozenn Le Berre éd., Manuel de soins palliatifs (pp. 910-918). Paris : Dunod. (2) OMS/HRH/HPN/10.3 (3) RAPPORT IGAS N°2018-140R (4) Faës, J. (2022). Echelle mesurant la construction d'une communauté interprofessionnelle de pratique en santé (CIPS) McGill International Congress on Palliative Care, Oct 18-21/2022

Suggested Citation

  • Jonathan Faes & Grégory Aiguier, 2023. "Évaluation d’un dispositif de formation à l’interprofessionnalité chez les étudiants en santé," Post-Print hal-04577638, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04577638
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04577638. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.