Cognitive load, social values and financial distress: drivers of restructuring decisions

Purpose This study aims to analyze the effect of cognitive load and social value orientation on managers' preferences when they face with two types of restructuring choices in financially distressed firms: the first belonging to the family of organizational restructuring (massive layoffs) and the second to the family of financial restructuring (debt increases). Design/methodology/approach The authors investigate experimentally the impact of managers' cognitive load and social value orientation on the decision to restructure leveraged buyout (LBO) firms in financial distress by using either massive layoffs or debt increases. Findings By investigating the impact of managers' cognitive load and social value orientation on the restructuring decision of an LBO firm in financial distress, the research reveals that, on average, cognitively loaded managers prefer massive layoffs over increased debt levels. The massive layoffs seemingly provide a relatively easier way to avoid conflict with influential, residual claimants. In contrast, social value–oriented managers actively avoid massive layoffs and prefer to increase debt. Research limitations/implications These results imply that the performance mechanisms emphasized to improve agency relations, for example, in LBOs, have their own limitations during periods of financial distress. This study shows that one of these limits is related to cognitive distortions and personality traits. Originality/value In this research, the originality lies in understanding how managers' internal factors affect their restructuring decision-making, in the case of LBO firms in financial distress.