IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-04574947.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Public value: to each their own?

Author

Listed:
  • Bruno Féral

    (CEREGE [Poitiers, La Rochelle] - Centre de recherche en gestion - IAE Poitiers - Institut d'Administration des Entreprises (IAE) - Poitiers - UP - Université de Poitiers = University of Poitiers - UP - Université de Poitiers = University of Poitiers - ULR - La Rochelle Université - Excelia Group | La Rochelle Business School)

  • Benjamin Dreveton

    (IAE Poitiers - Institut d'Administration des Entreprises (IAE) - Poitiers - UP - Université de Poitiers = University of Poitiers, CEREGE [Poitiers] - Centre de recherche en gestion - UP - Université de Poitiers = University of Poitiers)

Abstract

This paper studies the role of elected representatives in inter-organizational processes aimed at measuring public value. Specifically, it aims to offer a better understanding of the way collaboration between public managers, elected representatives, civil society and scientists can be derailed by the extraneous constraints borne by elected representatives. We explore the relationship between public value accounting, the authorizing environment and the role of the public manager (Moore, 2013) and question the democratic and managerial implications of the ability of elected representatives, as ostensible spokespeople for the authorizing environment, to unilaterally interrupt projects aimed at collaboratively define, measure, and assess public value creation. To do so, we mobilize Actor-Network Theory (Akrich, Callon & Latour, 2006) to describe specific human actors – elected representatives – engaging in a specific behavior: dissidence, by comparing two cases of "public value assessment failure" (Dreveton & Rocher, 2010, 2014; Féral, 2022). Factors such as different time scales and perspectives on public value and its assessment are shown to be important to understand such situations.

Suggested Citation

  • Bruno Féral & Benjamin Dreveton, 2024. "Public value: to each their own?," Post-Print hal-04574947, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04574947
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04574947. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.