IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-04569109.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Améliorer les outils numériques d’aide à la décision pour la protection phytosanitaire des cultures

Author

Listed:
  • Douadia Bougherara

    (CEE-M - Centre d'Economie de l'Environnement - Montpellier - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique - INRAE - Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement - Institut Agro Montpellier - Institut Agro - Institut national d'enseignement supérieur pour l'agriculture, l'alimentation et l'environnement - UM - Université de Montpellier)

  • Sophie Thoyer

    (CEE-M - Centre d'Economie de l'Environnement - Montpellier - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique - INRAE - Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement - Institut Agro Montpellier - Institut Agro - Institut national d'enseignement supérieur pour l'agriculture, l'alimentation et l'environnement - UM - Université de Montpellier)

Abstract

This article examines the contribution of economics to the analysis of decisions made by users of digital decision support tools (DSTs) to optimize crop protection. Starting from an economic and behavioral analysis of pesticide use by farmers, the authors analyze how farmers mobilize the information and recommendations provided by DSTs according to their attitudes to risk and their expectations and beliefs, notably about the reliability of the DST. The ex-ante economic assessment of user preferences for some DST features, and the ex-post evaluation of the impact of DSTs and their use, lead the authors to propose avenues of research using economics to improve the design of crop protection DSTs.

Suggested Citation

  • Douadia Bougherara & Sophie Thoyer, 2024. "Améliorer les outils numériques d’aide à la décision pour la protection phytosanitaire des cultures," Post-Print hal-04569109, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04569109
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04569109. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.