Author
Abstract
Food companies frequently use color as a tool for easy identification, with for instance Coca-Cola being associated with the color red. Previous research supports this notion of colors as a powerful cue, colors being showed to influence emotional responses (Babin et al. 2003; Bellizzi and Hite 1992), but also brand evaluation (Labrecque and Milne 2012), price perception (Babin et al. 2003; Puccinelli et al. 2013), and purchase intentions (Gorn et al. 1997; Labrecque and Milne 2012). Given this role of cognitions following color exposure, it may be that cognitive inferences explain the mixed evidence found for one particular color: red. This color often carries positive meanings, as it is associated with love or energy, but also negative ones, priming, for example, the notions of danger, mistakes, ban, transgression, or war (Elliot et al. 2007). Surprisingly, however, no research to date has examined how the negative associations induced by the color red might negatively affect emotions and behavior. Therefore, the current research relies on recent studies highlighting the aforementioned importance of color for food products to examine the effect of the color red on consumers' responses to food packages. Specifically, because of its negative meanings and specifically its association with mistakes (Mehta and Zhu 2009), the color red may prompt negative feelings that are closely linked to transgression, more specifically guilt, an emotion that results from the transgression of moral or social standards (Baumeister et al. 1994). To test this notion, this research builds on the S-O-R model and psychological literature on guilt to posit hypotheses about the relationship among red, negative cognitive associations, and guilt. The research tests the hypotheses in a series of three studies. Because of the historical opposition between red and green (Nakshian 1964), A first study using chip packages as stimuli demonstrates the indirect effect of the color red (vs. green) on guilt through the mediating role of negative cognitive associations. Then, two additional studies using candies and cereal bar packages, respectively, replicate these effects and also demonstrate the role of the vice versus virtue product type. The results highlight the moderating role of perception of the product as a vice product, with the color red leading to stronger negative associations and guilt for such products. Implications for further research are discussed. \textcopyright 2022, The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG.
Suggested Citation
R. Lunardo & C. Saintives & D. Chaney, 2022.
"Guilty Red Food Packages: How the Color Red Affects Guilt through Negative Cognitive Associations for Vice Products: An Abstract,"
Post-Print
hal-04444809, HAL.
Handle:
RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04444809
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-89883-0_4
Download full text from publisher
To our knowledge, this item is not available for
download. To find whether it is available, there are three
options:
1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's
web page
whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a
search for a similarly titled item that would be
available.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04444809. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.