IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-04435514.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Joint Impact of CSR Policy and Market Structure on Environmental Sustainability in Supply Chains

Author

Listed:
  • A. Hafezalkotob

    (La Trobe University)

  • S. Arisian

    (La Trobe University)

  • Raziyeh Reza-Gharehbagh

    (Métis Lab EM Normandie - EM Normandie - École de Management de Normandie)

  • L. Nersesian

    (Islamic Azad University)

Abstract

The integration of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) and Smart Manufacturing (SM) has emerged as a promising strategy for addressing carbon emissions. Governments can play a crucial role in promoting sustainable practices and environmental sustainability by implementing targeted policies and regulations. In this study, we examine the sustainability performance of competing smart supply chains that offer substitutable products under different CSR regulatory policies. Specifically, we investigate five CSR policies: Deregulation, Direct Tariff on Market, Sustainability Penalty and Credits, Direct Limitation on Sustainability, and Government Cooperative Sustainability Efforts. Using a game theoretical framework, we model and analyze the effectiveness of each CSR policy within monopoly and oligopoly market structures. Our results uncover the importance of considering the synergistic effects of market structure and CSR when designing sustainability strategies for policymakers and supply chain managers. For instance, the Direct Tariff on Market policy in the monopoly market is shown to be the preferred regulatory approach as it effectively enhances both supply chain profitability and environmental sustainability. Furthermore, the Direct Tariff on Market policy in the oligopoly market, along with the Direct Limitation on Sustainability policy in the monopoly market, results in a greater market share of sustainable products. Understanding these dynamics enables policymakers to make informed decisions that maximize the environmental benefits of CSR practices, considering varying market structures. \textcopyright 2023 The Author(s)

Suggested Citation

  • A. Hafezalkotob & S. Arisian & Raziyeh Reza-Gharehbagh & L. Nersesian, 2023. "Joint Impact of CSR Policy and Market Structure on Environmental Sustainability in Supply Chains," Post-Print hal-04435514, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04435514
    DOI: 10.1016/j.cie.2023.109654
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://normandie-univ.hal.science/hal-04435514
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://normandie-univ.hal.science/hal-04435514/document
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.cie.2023.109654?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zhang, Linghong & Wang, Jingguo & You, Jianxin, 2015. "Consumer environmental awareness and channel coordination with two substitutable products," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 241(1), pages 63-73.
    2. Kogg, Beatrice & Mont, Oksana, 2012. "Environmental and social responsibility in supply chains: The practise of choice and inter-organisational management," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 154-163.
    3. Asian, Sobhan & Hafezalkotob, Ashkan & John, Jubin Jacob, 2019. "Sharing economy in organic food supply chains: A pathway to sustainable development," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 218(C), pages 322-338.
    4. Kurt B. Waldman & John M. Kerr, 2014. "Limitations of Certification and Supply Chain Standards for Environmental Protection in Commodity Crop Production," Annual Review of Resource Economics, Annual Reviews, vol. 6(1), pages 429-449, October.
    5. Guo Li & Ming K. Lim & Zhaohua Wang, 2020. "Stakeholders, green manufacturing, and practice performance: empirical evidence from Chinese fashion businesses," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 290(1), pages 961-982, July.
    6. Reza-Gharehbagh, Raziyeh & Asian, Sobhan & Hafezalkotob, Ashkan & Wei, Chen, 2021. "Reframing supply chain finance in an era of reglobalization: On the value of multi-sided crowdfunding platforms," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 149(C).
    7. Cameron Hepburn, 2006. "Regulation by Prices, Quantities, or Both: A Review of Instrument Choice," Oxford Review of Economic Policy, Oxford University Press and Oxford Review of Economic Policy Limited, vol. 22(2), pages 226-247, Summer.
    8. Tamás, Mészáros Mátyás & Bade Shrestha, S.O. & Zhou, Huizhong, 2010. "Feed-in tariff and tradable green certificate in oligopoly," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(8), pages 4040-4047, August.
    9. Hafezalkotob, Ashkan, 2017. "Competition of domestic manufacturer and foreign supplier under sustainable development objectives of government," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 292(C), pages 294-308.
    10. Asian, Sobhan & Wang, Jian & Dickson, Geoff, 2020. "Trade disruptions, behavioral biases, and social influences: Can luxury sporting goods supply chains be immunized?," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 143(C).
    11. Bin Liu & Tao Li & Sang-Bing Tsai, 2017. "Low Carbon Strategy Analysis of Competing Supply Chains with Different Power Structures," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(5), pages 1-21, May.
    12. Guo Li & Lin Tian & Hong Zheng, 2021. "Information Sharing in an Online Marketplace with Co‐opetitive Sellers," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 30(10), pages 3713-3734, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wen Cheng & Qunqi Wu & Fei Ye & Qian Li, 2022. "The Impact of Government Interventions and Consumer Green Preferences on the Competition between Green and Nongreen Supply Chains," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-34, May.
    2. Coulon, Michael & Khazaei, Javad & Powell, Warren B., 2015. "SMART-SREC: A stochastic model of the New Jersey solar renewable energy certificate market," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 13-31.
    3. Jingci Xie & Jianjian Liu & Xin Huo & Qingchun Meng & Mengyu Chu, 2021. "Fresh Food Dual-Channel Supply Chain Considering Consumers’ Low-Carbon and Freshness Preferences," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-29, June.
    4. Li, Guo & Liu, Mengqi & Zheng, Hong, 2022. "Subsidization or Diversification? Mitigating Supply Disruption with Manufacturer Information Sharing," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).
    5. Yuyin Yi & Jinxi Li, 2018. "Cost-Sharing Contracts for Energy Saving and Emissions Reduction of a Supply Chain under the Conditions of Government Subsidies and a Carbon Tax," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-33, March.
    6. Mina Rahimi & Ashkan Hafezalkotob & Sobhan Asian & Luis Martínez, 2021. "Environmental Policy Making in Supply Chains under Ambiguity and Competition: A Fuzzy Stackelberg Game Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-24, February.
    7. Narita, Daiju & Requate, Till, 2021. "Price vs. quantity regulation of volatile energy supply and market entry of RES-E operators," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).
    8. Bin Chen & Wenying Xie & Fuyou Huang & Xinyang Li, 2020. "Energy-saving and pricing decisions in a sustainable supply chain considering behavioral concerns," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(8), pages 1-20, August.
    9. Reza-Gharehbagh, Raziyeh & Asian, Sobhan & Hafezalkotob, Ashkan & Wei, Chen, 2021. "Reframing supply chain finance in an era of reglobalization: On the value of multi-sided crowdfunding platforms," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 149(C).
    10. Grüll, Georg & Taschini, Luca, 2011. "Cap-and-trade properties under different hybrid scheme designs," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 61(1), pages 107-118, January.
    11. Linghong Zhang & Bowen Xue & Xiyu Liu, 2018. "Carbon Emission Reduction with Regard to Retailer’s Fairness Concern and Subsidies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-28, April.
    12. Yafeng Zou & Qi Wang & Min Deng & Yujie Wang, 2021. "Community Intervention System: COVID-19 Control in Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(23), pages 1-18, December.
    13. Deyan Yang & Jinyong Wang & Dongping Song, 2019. "Channel Structure Strategies of Supply Chains with Varying Green Cost and Governmental Interventions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-26, December.
    14. Dong, Ciwei & Liu, Qingyu & Shen, Bin, 2019. "To be or not to be green? Strategic investment for green product development in a supply chain," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 193-227.
    15. Webster, Mort & Sue Wing, Ian & Jakobovits, Lisa, 2010. "Second-best instruments for near-term climate policy: Intensity targets vs. the safety valve," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 59(3), pages 250-259, May.
    16. Mukherjee, Arka & Carvalho, Margarida, 2021. "Dynamic decision making in a mixed market under cooperation: Towards sustainability," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 241(C).
    17. Johan Swinnen & Alessandro Olper & Senne Vandevelde, 2021. "From unfair prices to unfair trading practices: Political economy, value chains and 21st century agri‐food policy," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 52(5), pages 771-788, September.
    18. Cloé Garnache & Scott M. Swinton & Joseph A. Herriges & Frank Lupi & R. Jan Stevenson, 2016. "Solving the Phosphorus Pollution Puzzle: Synthesis and Directions for Future Research," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 98(5), pages 1334-1359.
    19. Peter Heindl, 2017. "The impact of administrative transaction costs in the EU emissions trading system," Climate Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(3), pages 314-329, April.
    20. Schindele, Stephan & Trommsdorff, Maximilian & Schlaak, Albert & Obergfell, Tabea & Bopp, Georg & Reise, Christian & Braun, Christian & Weselek, Axel & Bauerle, Andrea & Högy, Petra & Goetzberger, Ado, 2020. "Implementation of agrophotovoltaics: Techno-economic analysis of the price-performance ratio and its policy implications," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 265(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04435514. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.