IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-04382262.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

A novel framework for FMEA using evidential BWM and SMAA-MARCOS method

Author

Listed:
  • Yanbing Ju
  • Qian Zhao
  • Martínez Luis
  • Yuanyuan Liang
  • Jinhua Dong
  • Peiwu Dong
  • Mihalis Giannakis

    (Audencia Business School)

Abstract

This paper presents a novel failure mode and effect analysis (FMEA) framework as a formal design method to ensure safety and reliability. FMEA is used to identify potential failure modes (FMs), and it is crucial to determine the weights of risk factors and prioritize FMs. In this work, we propose a comprehensive framework that integrates the Dempster-Shafer theory, best-worst method (BWM), stochastic multi-objective acceptability analysis (SMAA), and measurement of alternatives and ranking according to compromise solution (MARCOS) to address this problem. To capture the uncertainty caused by the loss of information, the Dempster-Shafer theory is applied for dealing with the uncertainty about risk factors and FMs in terms of linguistic information. Based on the comprehensive evidential preference interval vectors of risk factors constructed by Dempster-Shafer theory, an evidential BWM combined with SMAA is proposed to determine the optimal set of risk factor weights. Meanwhile, based on the constructed interval belief interval decision matrix of FMs to risk factors constructed by Dempster-Shafer theory, an evidential SMAA-MARCOS method is proposed for determining the risk priority of FMs. Further, we conduct a case study to evaluate the risk of equipment in an automobile manufacturing enterprise. A sensitivity and comparative analysis are also conducted to demonstrate the effectiveness and superiority of the proposed framework.

Suggested Citation

  • Yanbing Ju & Qian Zhao & Martínez Luis & Yuanyuan Liang & Jinhua Dong & Peiwu Dong & Mihalis Giannakis, 2024. "A novel framework for FMEA using evidential BWM and SMAA-MARCOS method," Post-Print hal-04382262, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04382262
    DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2023.122796
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04382262. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.