IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-04329813.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Compétition entre gérants de fonds : prise de risque et effort

Author

Listed:
  • Huyen Nguyen-Thi-Thanh

    (GAINS - ARGUMANS - Atelier De Recherche En Gestion De L'université Du Mans - GAINS - Groupe d'Analyse des Itinéraires et des Niveaux Salariaux - UM - Le Mans Université, TEPP - Travail, Emploi et Politiques Publiques - UPEM - Université Paris-Est Marne-la-Vallée - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, IRA - Institut des Régions Arides)

  • Duc-De Ngo

    (LEO - Laboratoire d'Économie d'Orleans [2022-...] - UO - Université d'Orléans - UT - Université de Tours - UCA - Université Clermont Auvergne)

  • Franceline Mercurelli

    (LEO - Laboratoire d'Économie d'Orleans [2022-...] - UO - Université d'Orléans - UT - Université de Tours - UCA - Université Clermont Auvergne)

Abstract

This article investigates the way that mutual fund managers respond to the incentives induced by ranking objectives in order to maximize their year-end revenues. In addition to shifting their portfolio?s riskiness, managers can modify their level of effort. The existence of several possible combinations of risk-effort provides a new insight into contradictory conclusions obtained in the literature. We show that the ?gamble for resurrection? behavior happens only when the effort cost is sufficiently high. For the other situations, winners and losers adopt the same combinations of risk-effort. In many cases, a high level of risk is associated with a high level of effort. Empirical verifications conducted on a sample of US mutual funds corroborate our principal theoretical predictions. Classification JEL : G11, G23.

Suggested Citation

  • Huyen Nguyen-Thi-Thanh & Duc-De Ngo & Franceline Mercurelli, 2017. "Compétition entre gérants de fonds : prise de risque et effort," Post-Print hal-04329813, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04329813
    DOI: 10.3917/reco.684.0595
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • G11 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Portfolio Choice; Investment Decisions
    • G23 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - Non-bank Financial Institutions; Financial Instruments; Institutional Investors

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04329813. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.