IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-04329189.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Explaining Complexity in Actual Securitization Structures: An Epistemic Pitfall in Corporate Finance

Author

Listed:
  • Laurent Gauthier

    (CEREFIGE - Centre Européen de Recherche en Economie Financière et Gestion des Entreprises - UL - Université de Lorraine, LED - Laboratoire d'Economie Dionysien - UP8 - Université Paris 8 Vincennes-Saint-Denis)

Abstract

Securitization has been a subject of interest in the security design literature, and various models have been developed to explain the existence of senior securities and junior securities. However, securitization structures are far more complex than a simple tranching by seniority, and manipulate interest as well as principal. We first address the fundamental reasons why some investors require par-priced securities, before modeling the contractibility of both interest and principal, as well as the par-pricing constraint. We can derive optimal designs closely resembling actual securitization structures. We also analyze the interactions between collateral characteristics and pricing at equilibrium, and show how much more attractive an excess-spread structure is relative to a more standard structure as expected collateral losses increase, explaining the widespread use of these mechanisms on low-quality collateral. We ascribe the fact that financial economics have not sought to explain the peculiar nature of structural complexity to an epistemological framework that privileged consistency with corporate debt analysis. This article received the Peter L. Bernstein award of 2023: https://www.pm-research.com/PB-Award/2023Winner

Suggested Citation

  • Laurent Gauthier, 2023. "Explaining Complexity in Actual Securitization Structures: An Epistemic Pitfall in Corporate Finance," Post-Print hal-04329189, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04329189
    DOI: 10.3905/jfi.2023.1.158
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04329189. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.